Drones
Providers using this tag (99)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 67 Almost no public developer surface
PrenavElroy AirInsituZeitviewBRINCWestmagbluefliteFreedom RoboticsGather AIZiplineAeronextDronamicsAirforestrySensemeshFirestormDotterelMach IndustriesOrqaAerodyneCx2ZeromatterAsylonDrone Racing LeagueBrumbyVermeerPykaBirdstopIONAValinorWingAerialoopRedWing Aerospace LaboratoriesAerospace Times FeipengDoxelLily CameraSkycatchUnmanndFIMI TechnologyKyten TechnologiesSeeing SystemsQuantum SystemsTekeverCoolantFirnas AeroMightyFlyOrnadyneTerra IndustriesAerodomeAmerican Aerospace AdvisorsRaphe MphibrTarget ArmTopXGunDeglaEarendil RoboticsIris AutomationMaquoketa ResearchPitch AeronauticsSE3 LabsVimaanArlo IndustriesAirQtelImpossible AerospacePerformance Drone WorksTenet IndustriesAirMapAirwareKespry
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (13)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
FAA UAS Data Delivery System Open DataArcGIS Open Data hub for unmanned aircraft data — UAS Facility Maps (the LAANC altitude grid), national sec...MAVLink ProtocolMAVLink is the message-level interoperability standard for drones, and the Dronecode Foundation publishes i...MAVSDK gRPC APIMAVSDK is the Dronecode Foundation's programmable interface to any MAVLink vehicle, and the only surface in...PX4 AutopilotPX4 is the open source flight control firmware the Dronecode Foundation stewards — the software running on ...Wingtra Customer and Partner Portal GraphQL APIThe GraphQL API behind my.wingtra.com, Wingtra's customer and partner portal. The schema answers anonymous ...WingtraCLOUD APIThe versioned REST API the WingtraCLOUD browser client at cloud.wingtra.com calls — sites, flights, drones,...Skydio Cloud APIThe Skydio Cloud API is an HTTP-based REST API with JSON request and response bodies that lets developers m...
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
airwiseOS APIAPI for UAS services including flight planning, real-time tracking, airspace restrictions and UTM coordinat...APEX — Adaptive Payload EXchangeAPEX is Neros Technologies' open, MIT-licensed plug-and-play protocol for connecting drone platforms (hosts...Percepto AIM APIThe HTTP API behind the Percepto AIM (Autonomous Inspection and Monitoring) console at drones.percepto.co. ...XAG Open PlatformXAG's developer Open Platform (Chinese-language) integrating application management, device data authorizat...
Score breakdown
Frequency
56.1
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
2.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
14.1
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
9.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
99 providers carry this tag directly, and 101 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 2 more to reach.
Related tags
UAV 23 co-occurrences
Autonomous Systems 14 co-occurrences
UAS 8 co-occurrences
Defense 31 co-occurrences
Robotics 40 co-occurrences
Aerospace 27 co-occurrences
Public Safety 12 co-occurrences
Airspace 7 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag99
Api tag13
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 87 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Drones, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
87
of 99 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
12.5
-10.4 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
3.8
-8.1 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
0–51.1
median 7.8 · σ 11.7
How the 87 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 0Developing 6Thin 5Emerging 19Minimal 57
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 2.7 | 6.3 | -3.6 | 87 |
| Discoverability | 53.6 | 58.1 | -4.5 | 87 |
| Operational Transparency | 4.6 | 13.7 | -9.1 | 87 |
| Access Clarity | 14.8 | 26.5 | -11.7 | 87 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 11.3 | 23.2 | -11.9 | 87 |
| Contract Quality | 5 | 17.6 | -12.6 | 87 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 14% | -9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 0% | 12% | -12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 5% | 11% | -6 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 0% | 14% | -14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Federal Aviation Administration 51.1
- 2 Dronecode Foundation 48.1
- 3 Aerones 46.5
- 4 Wingtra 44.7
- 5 Aloft 42.8
- 6 Skydio 40.4
- 7 Sentera 35.3
- 8 Airspace Link 33.2
- 9 Voltair 30.7
- 10 Aarav Unmanned Systems (Aereo) 27.4
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Aerones 44.1
- 2 Voltair 39
- 3 Aarav Unmanned Systems (Aereo) 31.9
- 4 Wingtra 31.3
- 5 Federal Aviation Administration 28.2
- 6 Sentera 24.8
- 7 Dronecode Foundation 22.5
- 8 Advanced Aircraft Company 21.9
- 9 Aloft 21.4
- 10 Skydio 19.8
All 99 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 87 carry a score (88%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 86 of 87 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 86 of 87 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.