Kubernetes
Providers using this tag (287)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 14 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 35 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 72 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 73 Limited public surface area
Emerging 61 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 30 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (178)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 14 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 17 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 59 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 43 Limited public surface area
Emerging 36 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (33)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Kubernetes” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
287 providers carry this tag directly, and 288 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 1 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 268 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Kubernetes, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 42.1 | 24.5 | +17.6 | 268 |
| Contract Quality | 33.9 | 18.6 | +15.3 | 268 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.6 | 13.2 | +14.4 | 268 |
| Discoverability | 65 | 59.1 | +5.9 | 268 |
| Contract Governance | 15 | 9.7 | +5.3 | 268 |
| Access Clarity | 29.9 | 30 | -0.1 | 268 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 19% | 18% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 16% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 13% | -2 |
| Security | 97% | 99% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 1% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 63% | 36% | +27 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Azure Kubernetes Service 77.3
- 2 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 75.6
- 3 Akuity 73.7
- 4 DoiT 72.8
- 5 Nutanix 72.2
- 6 Azure Arc 72.1
- 7 Amazon EKS 71.1
- 8 Replicated 71.1
- 9 NexGen Cloud 69.8
- 10 Azure Container Apps 68.3
- 1 DoiT 74.1
- 2 Antimetal 55.1
- 3 CoreStack 53.5
- 4 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 50
- 5 Groundcover 50
- 6 Grafana Loki 49.8
- 7 Vultr 49.8
- 8 Tigera 46.5
- 9 Kubeshop 45.1
- 10 Crunchy Data 45
Coverage caveat. 202 of 268 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.