Kubernetes
Providers using this tag (269)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 19 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 77 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 78 Limited public surface area
Emerging 67 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 17 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (171)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 58 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 49 Limited public surface area
Emerging 33 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (33)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Kubernetes” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
270 providers carry this tag directly, and 271 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 2 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 259 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Kubernetes, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.1 | 23.2 | +16.9 | 259 |
| Contract Quality | 33.5 | 17.6 | +15.9 | 259 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.5 | 13.7 | +12.8 | 259 |
| Discoverability | 63.6 | 58.1 | +5.5 | 259 |
| Contract Governance | 11.3 | 6.3 | +5 | 259 |
| Access Clarity | 29.5 | 26.5 | +3 | 259 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 18% | 14% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 12% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 96% | 98% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 36% | 14% | +22 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 76.4
- 2 Azure Kubernetes Service 73.5
- 3 Akuity 72.9
- 4 Red Hat 70.6
- 5 Densify 69.5
- 6 DoiT 68.4
- 7 NVIDIA NIM 68
- 8 Nutanix 67.4
- 9 Spectro Cloud 66.6
- 10 Calico 66.3
- 1 DoiT 74.4
- 2 CoreStack 55.5
- 3 Antimetal 54.3
- 4 Groundcover 50
- 5 Grafana Loki 49.8
- 6 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 49.3
- 7 Red Hat 49.2
- 8 Kubeshop 47.7
- 9 NexGen Cloud 44.7
- 10 Linode 44.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.