Kubernetes
Kuberneteskubernetes
Providers using this tag (274)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 17 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 81 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 89 Limited public surface area
Emerging 59 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 18 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (190)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 22 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 61 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 63 Limited public surface area
Emerging 35 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (42)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Kubernetes” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 263 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Kubernetes, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 36.8 | 19.8 | +17 | 263 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.3 | 23.4 | +16.9 | 263 |
| Operational Transparency | 26 | 14 | +12 | 263 |
| Contract Governance | 11.4 | 6.4 | +5 | 263 |
| Discoverability | 65.7 | 61.2 | +4.5 | 263 |
| Access Clarity | 29 | 26.5 | +2.5 | 263 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 10% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 13% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 97% | 97% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 36% | 14% | +22 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Azure Kubernetes Service 72.2
- 2 Akuity 71.5
- 3 Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 71.1
- 4 Calico 71
- 5 Densify 69.7
- 6 Authentik 69.1
- 7 NVIDIA NIM 68.3
- 8 DoiT 66.5
- 9 NexGen Cloud 64.3
- 10 Grafana Loki 62.5
- 1 DoiT 74.4
- 2 CoreStack 55.5
- 3 Antimetal 54.3
- 4 Kubeshop 51.8
- 5 Tigera 50.2
- 6 Red Hat 50.1
- 7 Groundcover 50
- 8 Grafana Loki 49.8
- 9 NexGen Cloud 47.2
- 10 Densify 43.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.