Containers
Containerscontainers
Providers using this tag (137)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 42 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 34 Limited public surface area
Emerging 29 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (101)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 20 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 33 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (53)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Containers” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 127 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Containers, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 39.5 | 19.8 | +19.7 | 127 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.4 | 23.4 | +18 | 127 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.2 | 14 | +14.2 | 127 |
| Access Clarity | 34.2 | 26.5 | +7.7 | 127 |
| Contract Governance | 11.9 | 6.4 | +5.5 | 127 |
| Discoverability | 64.1 | 61.2 | +2.9 | 127 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 10% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 13% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 91% | 97% | -6 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 42% | 14% | +28 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon Web Services (AWS) 78.2
- 2 Azure Kubernetes Service 72.2
- 3 Calico 71
- 4 Cloudflare 65.1
- 5 Canonical 64.4
- 6 Koyeb 64.2
- 7 Azure Container Apps 61.6
- 8 Paperspace 61
- 9 IBM 60
- 10 JFrog Container Registry 57.6
- 1 Upsun 54.5
- 2 Red Hat 50.1
- 3 Cloudflare 49.6
- 4 Platform.sh 49.5
- 5 Canonical 43.3
- 6 Calico 42.1
- 7 Koyeb 39.8
- 8 Cloud Foundry 37.5
- 9 IBM 37.3
- 10 Amazon Web Services (AWS) 37.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.