Cloud-Native
Cloud NativeCloud-Native
Providers using this tag (145)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 35 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 56 Limited public surface area
Emerging 34 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 12 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (43)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (15)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Cloud-Native” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 136 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Cloud-Native, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 35.8 | 19.8 | +16 | 136 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.3 | 14 | +11.3 | 136 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 31.6 | 23.4 | +8.2 | 136 |
| Contract Governance | 11.9 | 6.4 | +5.5 | 136 |
| Discoverability | 64 | 61.2 | +2.8 | 136 |
| Access Clarity | 21.1 | 26.5 | -5.4 | 136 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 10% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 13% | -9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 96% | 97% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 49% | 14% | +35 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Akuity 71.5
- 2 Grafana Loki 62.5
- 3 Solo.io 62.3
- 4 Spectro Cloud 57.2
- 5 Gloo 56.3
- 6 IBM WebSphere 54.3
- 7 Tigera 51.9
- 8 Kubeshop 51.8
- 9 Etcd 51.2
- 10 Artifact Hub 50.7
- 1 Kubeshop 51.8
- 2 Tigera 50.2
- 3 Grafana Loki 49.8
- 4 Solo.io 37.6
- 5 Gloo 34.4
- 6 Aqua Security 34
- 7 OpenFeature 33.1
- 8 NGINX 31.5
- 9 IBM WebSphere 30.6
- 10 Application Research 29.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.