Cloud-Native
Providers using this tag (144)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 36 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 46 Limited public surface area
Emerging 37 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 16 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (36)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (13)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Cloud-Native” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
144 providers carry this tag directly, and 164 counting the 3 narrower tags below — 20 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 137 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Cloud-Native, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 32.6 | 17.6 | +15 | 137 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.8 | 13.7 | +12.1 | 137 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 32 | 23.2 | +8.8 | 137 |
| Contract Governance | 11.3 | 6.3 | +5 | 137 |
| Discoverability | 59.8 | 58.1 | +1.7 | 137 |
| Access Clarity | 20.4 | 26.5 | -6.1 | 137 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 14% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 12% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 96% | 98% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 49% | 14% | +35 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Akuity 72.9
- 2 Spectro Cloud 66.6
- 3 Grafana Loki 66.1
- 4 Solo.io 63
- 5 Backstage 62.8
- 6 IBM WebSphere 58
- 7 Gloo 57.8
- 8 Tigera 55.9
- 9 Kubeshop 52.9
- 10 MinIO 50.9
- 1 Backstage 60.4
- 2 Grafana Loki 49.8
- 3 Kubeshop 47.7
- 4 Tigera 39.1
- 5 Solo.io 37.6
- 6 Gloo 34.4
- 7 Aqua Security 33.7
- 8 OpenFeature 33.1
- 9 NGINX 31.2
- 10 IBM WebSphere 30.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.