Service Mesh
Providers using this tag (43)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (33)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 43 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Service Mesh, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 39.1 | 17.5 | +21.6 | 43 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.6 | 11.3 | +13.3 | 43 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 29 | 17.9 | +11.1 | 43 |
| Contract Governance | 13 | 6.4 | +6.6 | 43 |
| Discoverability | 65.6 | 60.4 | +5.2 | 43 |
| Access Clarity | 24.5 | 22.3 | +2.2 | 43 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 16% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 7% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 5% | 9% | -4 |
| Security | 95% | 88% | +7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 60% | 13% | +47 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Solo.io 68.4
- 2 Amazon ECS 52.9
- 3 AWS App Mesh 52
- 4 Kong 51.2
- 5 Red Hat OpenShift 47.8
- 6 Amazon App Mesh 46.2
- 7 Amazon VPC Lattice 40.6
- 8 Tetrate 40.6
- 9 Traefik Labs 40.3
- 10 Google Cloud Service Mesh 38.9
- 1 Solo.io 37.6
- 2 AWS App Mesh 37.1
- 3 Kong 35.8
- 4 Amazon App Mesh 31.7
- 5 Traefik Mesh 26.7
- 6 Google Cloud Service Mesh 26.5
- 7 APIClarity 25.5
- 8 Envoy 25.5
- 9 Amazon ECS 24.8
- 10 Google Anthos 24.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/service-mesh"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/service-mesh"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/service-mesh/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.