Service Mesh
Providers using this tag (36)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (34)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (8)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Service Mesh” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 35 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Service Mesh, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 39.8 | 19.8 | +20 | 35 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.4 | 23.4 | +18 | 35 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.6 | 14 | +14.6 | 35 |
| Contract Governance | 14.1 | 6.4 | +7.7 | 35 |
| Discoverability | 64.8 | 61.2 | +3.6 | 35 |
| Access Clarity | 28 | 26.5 | +1.5 | 35 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 10% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 13% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 97% | 97% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 57% | 14% | +43 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Calico 71
- 2 Solo.io 62.3
- 3 Kong 58
- 4 Gloo 56.3
- 5 Buoyant 52.5
- 6 AWS App Mesh 51.5
- 7 Gloo Mesh 48.9
- 8 Amazon App Mesh 44.4
- 9 Envoy 44
- 10 Apache Dubbo 43.4
- 1 Calico 42.1
- 2 Solo.io 37.6
- 3 AWS App Mesh 37.1
- 4 Gloo 34.4
- 5 Kong 33.2
- 6 APIClarity 32.5
- 7 Amazon App Mesh 29.5
- 8 Gloo Mesh 28.5
- 9 Envoy 27.3
- 10 Traefik Mesh 26.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.