Microservices
Providers using this tag (100)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 23 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 29 Limited public surface area
Emerging 26 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (30)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (11)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Microservices” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 93 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Microservices, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 36.8 | 17.6 | +19.2 | 93 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.3 | 13.7 | +13.6 | 93 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.6 | 23.2 | +10.4 | 93 |
| Contract Governance | 14.6 | 6.3 | +8.3 | 93 |
| Access Clarity | 27.9 | 26.5 | +1.4 | 93 |
| Discoverability | 59.4 | 58.1 | +1.3 | 93 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 14% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 12% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 6% | 11% | -5 |
| Security | 94% | 98% | -4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 69% | 14% | +55 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Datadog APM 81.9
- 2 Apigee 70.8
- 3 NVIDIA NIM 68
- 4 Azure Container Apps 62.6
- 5 Amazon SQS 58.7
- 6 IBM WebSphere 58
- 7 AWS App Runner 56
- 8 Signadot 55.6
- 9 AWS App Mesh 55.1
- 10 Encore 52.5
- 1 Datadog APM 56
- 2 Grafana Tempo 51.7
- 3 Encore 50.4
- 4 AWS App Mesh 37.1
- 5 Restate 32.5
- 6 Apigee 31.4
- 7 IBM WebSphere 30.6
- 8 Amazon Fargate 30.6
- 9 Amazon SQS 29.6
- 10 Open Liberty 29.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.