Java
Providers using this tag (99)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 38 Limited public surface area
Emerging 32 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (134)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 44 Limited public surface area
Emerging 45 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (75)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Java” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 75 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 97 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Java, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 30.9 | 19.8 | +11.1 | 97 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.8 | 14 | +10.8 | 97 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 30.2 | 23.4 | +6.8 | 97 |
| Contract Governance | 12.3 | 6.4 | +5.9 | 97 |
| Discoverability | 61.4 | 61.2 | +0.2 | 97 |
| Access Clarity | 19.6 | 26.5 | -6.9 | 97 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 10% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 3% | 13% | -10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 2% | 11% | -9 |
| Security | 91% | 97% | -6 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 51% | 14% | +37 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 dotCMS 70.4
- 2 Bonitasoft 64.3
- 3 ThingsBoard 62.3
- 4 Eclipse Foundation 61.5
- 5 Gradle 55.8
- 6 Zeebe 48.6
- 7 Apollo Config 47.2
- 8 Spring Framework 46.2
- 9 Spring WebFlux 45.3
- 10 Apache OFBiz 45.1
- 1 Eclipse Foundation 48.4
- 2 dotCMS 42.3
- 3 Apache ActiveMQ 30.6
- 4 ThingsBoard 29.8
- 5 Open Liberty 29.6
- 6 Bonitasoft 28.5
- 7 Quarkus 28.2
- 8 Gradle 27.7
- 9 Zeebe 26.5
- 10 Apache James 26.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.