SDK
SDKSDKsSdksdKs
Providers using this tag (357)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 49 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 97 Limited public surface area
Emerging 148 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 36 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (650)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 25 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 76 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 228 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 229 Limited public surface area
Emerging 87 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (323)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “SDK” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 323 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 335 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged SDK, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.3 | 23.4 | +19.9 | 335 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.1 | 14 | +4.1 | 335 |
| Discoverability | 64.8 | 61.2 | +3.6 | 335 |
| Contract Governance | 6.5 | 6.4 | +0.1 | 335 |
| Access Clarity | 23.7 | 26.5 | -2.8 | 335 |
| Contract Quality | 14.8 | 19.8 | -5 | 335 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 10% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 5% | 11% | -6 |
| Security | 94% | 97% | -3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cvent Registration 82
- 2 Cvent Event Cloud 69.9
- 3 General Translation 64.3
- 4 Buf 61
- 5 Dwolla 60.2
- 6 Suki AI 57.8
- 7 Lucra Sports 56.6
- 8 Swagger Codegen 56.2
- 9 Dagger 55.9
- 10 API League 54.9
- 1 Dwolla 52.9
- 2 Buf 51.7
- 3 Cvent Event Cloud 46.1
- 4 Android 43.9
- 5 WSC Sports 41.7
- 6 Firework 41
- 7 Terminal Use 39
- 8 Lucra Sports 38.4
- 9 Cvent Registration 38.3
- 10 Snap 37.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.