Markets · bedrock market · provisional

Container Registries (OCI Distribution)

De jure shape (oci distribution spec) with a conformance register. The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.

20providers measured
7 (35.0%)declare their own
7 (35.0%)covered by others only
6 (30.0%)undeclared
16declare compatibility (report only, not weighted)
0in-market workflows shown
Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.

Where this market publishes its structure

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 20 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

TagsContainers 55%, Registry 40%, Docker 30%, Container Images 30%, DevOps 25%
Tag groupsKubernetes 70%, Registry 55%, Developer Tools 30%, Repository 25%
IndustriesDeveloper Tools & DevOps 90%
AreasContainers 55%, Database 10%, Serverless 10%
CapabilitiesSoftware Release & Deployment Management 35%, Cybersecurity Management 30%, Information Technology Management 20%

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 1 · other companies invest to build on it

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Docker Hub 51.8 71 66 / 5 0 0 2 partner-built 93%, ipaas-bridge 3%, standard 3%, covered 1%

builds-on 1 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Gitea 46.8 12 0 / 12 1 4 0 standard 25%, builds-on-platform 33%, distribution 33%, unknown 8%

covered 2 · reached mainly through aggregators

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 44.6 10 0 / 10 0 1 1 ipaas-bridge 10%, standard 40%, covered 40%, distribution 10%
Keygen 29.2 4 0 / 4 0 1 1 ipaas-bridge 25%, standard 25%, covered 25%, distribution 25%

standard 8 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
ORAS 50.5 3 0 / 3 0 1 0 standard 67%, distribution 33%
Cloudsmith 45.0 10 0 / 10 0 1 1 ipaas-bridge 9%, standard 45%, builds-on-platform 36%, distribution 9%
JFrog Artifactory 34.5 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 0 standard 100%
Quay 34.5 thin 2 0 / 2 0 0 0 standard 100%
Amazon ECR 17.2 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Sonatype Nexus 17.2 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Azure Container Registry 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 standard 100%
GitLab Container Registry 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 standard 100%

mixed 2 · no single mode dominates

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Scaleway 52.4 12 0 / 12 0 0 1 ipaas-bridge 8%, standard 42%, covered 17%, builds-on-platform 33%
Microsoft Azure 48.5 881 0 / 881 0 928 1 distribution 99%

undeclared 6 · declares nothing we can read: no number

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
GitHub Container Registry undeclared-----
Google Artifact Registry undeclared-----
Google Cloud Container Registry undeclared-----
Harbor undeclared-----
JFrog Container Registry undeclared-----
Open Container Initiative undeclared-----

Shape adoption report only — not weighted

Report only, not weighted (Kin, 2026-10-13): `compatible` edges are shape votes (the provider re-serves the anchor's contract). They are shown here and as 'declares compatibility' on a provider, and are excluded from depth, position and the own/covered declaration until they hold across four weekly snapshots.

Pattern: register. Shape gravity (counted by company, one edge per provider, the best evidence kept): 16. Convergence in the cohort: 15 of 19 (78.9%) — cohort members (minus the anchor's family, mediators and rival shapes) with at least one compatible edge to the shape, read from evidence.

oci-distribution anchor Open Container Initiative · 16 adopters, 16 declared by the provider

By degree: full 10, declared-unqualified 6. By evidence: conformance-register 7, own-docs 7, own-contract 2.

Snapshot timeline 3 weekly snapshot(s); nothing is weighted until it holds across four

DateProvidersDeclared by the providerPer shape (gravity / declared)
2026-10-131515 oci-distribution 15 / 15
2026-10-151616 oci-distribution 16 / 16
2026-10-171616 oci-distribution 16 / 16

Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.