DevOps
Providers using this tag (332)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 19 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 42 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 86 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 79 Limited public surface area
Emerging 67 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 36 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (64)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 11 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (27)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “DevOps” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
332 providers carry this tag directly, and 334 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 2 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Jenkins Plugins + CD Foundation Landscape | 50% |
| Developer Tools | 44% |
| Backstage Plugin Directory | 37% |
| Container Registries (OCI Distribution) | 25% |
| Cloud Native (Kubernetes, CNCF, FinOps) | 21% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 314 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged DevOps, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.6 | 23.2 | +20.4 | 314 |
| Contract Quality | 32.7 | 17.2 | +15.5 | 314 |
| Operational Transparency | 28 | 13 | +15 | 314 |
| Access Clarity | 37.4 | 23.9 | +13.5 | 314 |
| Discoverability | 64.5 | 57.9 | +6.6 | 314 |
| Contract Governance | 11.7 | 6.5 | +5.2 | 314 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 30% | 13% | +17 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 28% | 12% | +16 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 16% | +15 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Harness 89.2
- 2 GitHub Actions 81.3
- 3 LaunchDarkly 79.7
- 4 Flagsmith 77
- 5 OutSystems 75.8
- 6 Azure DevOps 75.4
- 7 Amazon Lightsail 73.8
- 8 Amazon CodeGuru Profiler 73.7
- 9 KnoxCall 73.7
- 10 Akuity 73
- 1 KnoxCall 63.3
- 2 Harness 63.2
- 3 LaunchDarkly 60.6
- 4 Checkly 59.5
- 5 Upsun 59.4
- 6 DevCycle 57.4
- 7 Lightrun 56.5
- 8 CircleCI 56.1
- 9 Platform.sh 55.3
- 10 Antimetal 55.1
Coverage caveat. 255 of 314 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.