Markets · bedrock market · provisional

Developer Tools

Platform market (extension marketplaces). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.

25providers measured

21 (84.0%)declare their own

1 (4.0%)covered by others only

1 (4.0%)distribution only (sell through, not integrations)

2 (8.0%)undeclared

2declare compatibility (report only, not weighted)

1in-market workflows shown (1 bridges)

Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.

Where this market publishes its structure

GitHub Marketplace apps (server-rendered listing JSON, verified domain per app) machine-readable
GitHub Marketplace actions, verified creators only (unverified actions name a login, not a company) machine-readable
Atlassian Marketplace REST API (rest/2/addons) with vendor homepages machine-readable
JetBrains Marketplace API (searchPlugins + plugin vendor) machine-readable
VS Code Marketplace gallery extensionquery (verified publisher domains) machine-readable
GitLab project integrations (GitLab-built; no third-party marketplace) machine-readable
GitHub Marketplace GraphQL marketplaceListings not machine-readable: needs authentication
Unverified GitHub Actions and VS Code publishers' claimed domains not machine-readable: no verified publisher identity; logged, never linked

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-15 from the 25 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

Tags	Developer Tools 60%, DevOps 44%, CI/CD 36%, Observability 20%, Continuous Integration 20%, Feature Flags 20%
Tag groups	Developer Tools 80%, Observability 24%, Version Control 24%, Personalization 20%
Industries	Developer Tools & DevOps 100%, Artificial Intelligence 20%
Areas	Observability 20%, Monitoring 20%
Capabilities	Software Release & Deployment Management 64%, Software Product Engineering Management 40%, Developer Platform & API Ecosystem Management 36%, Cybersecurity Management 36%

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 5 · other companies invest to build on it

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Atlassian	51.8	155	152 / 3	0	partner-built 98%, provider-built 1%, builds-on-platform 1%
GitHub	51.8	173	137 / 36	30	partner-built 81%, provider-built 1%, ipaas-bridge 17%, builds-on-platform 1%
GitHub Actions	51.8	199	198 / 1	0	partner-built 99%, provider-built 1%
JetBrains	51.8	82	79 / 3	0	partner-built 96%, provider-built 1%, builds-on-platform 2%
VS Code Marketplace	51.8	127	126 / 1	0	partner-built 99%, provider-built 1%

builds-on 12 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
LaunchDarkly	52.6	12	0 / 12	0	0	covered 33%, builds-on-platform 67%
Sentry	52.4	5	0 / 5	0	0	standard 20%, covered 20%, builds-on-platform 60%
Snyk	51.8	5	0 / 5	0	0	builds-on-platform 100%
Flagsmith	51.7	3	0 / 3	0	0	builds-on-platform 100%
JFrog	51.7	7	0 / 7	0	0	builds-on-platform 100%
Statsig	49.9	9	0 / 9	1	0	covered 33%, builds-on-platform 56%, distribution 11%
CircleCI	44.1	6	0 / 6	2	0	builds-on-platform 67%, distribution 33%
Harness	34.5 thin	2	0 / 2	0	0	builds-on-platform 100%
OutSystems	26.8 thin	2	0 / 2	2	0	builds-on-platform 33%, distribution 67%
Postman	24.3	26	0 / 26	0	12	ipaas-bridge 71%, builds-on-platform 29%
CloudBees	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	0	0	builds-on-platform 100%
Netlify	17.2 thin	1	0 / 1	0	0	builds-on-platform 100%

coverage 1 · reaches banks, carriers, systems or channels (an aggregator)

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
GitLab	47.7	74	0 / 74	0	0	30	ipaas-bridge 42%, coverage 54%, builds-on-platform 4%

covered 1 · reached mainly through aggregators

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Bugsnag	53.2	4	0 / 4	0	0	0	standard 25%, covered 50%, builds-on-platform 25%

standard 1 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Gitea		0	0 / 0	0	0	0	standard 100%

core 1 · builds the connectors its customers need

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Datadog	52.3	611	162 / 449	47	0	30	partner-built 26%, provider-built 61%, ipaas-bridge 4%, builds-on-platform 1%, unknown 7%

mixed 1 · no single mode dominates

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Vercel	44.1	3	0 / 3	0	1	0	covered 33%, builds-on-platform 33%, distribution 33%

distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Checkly	9.6 thin	1	0 / 1	0	1	0	distribution 100%

undeclared 2 · declares nothing we can read: no number

Provider	Depth	Integrations	In / out	Unknown builder	Distribution	iPaaS bridge	Mix
Kinde	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-
Azure DevOps	undeclared	-	-	-	-	-

Top workflows by market votes

Workflows (Arazzo) and their phrasing are generated by API Evangelist, ranked by market votes (integration edges in the graph, weighted by channel).

In-market workflows only: a step on the market provider's side maps to this market's business capabilities (BC-4200, BC-4210, BC-4220, BC-4270, BC-4280), and the partner is not a generic export/notify app. Other workflows are counted as bridges (including any whose steps do not resolve to a capability yet). Methodology. In-market: 1; bridges: 1.

Workflow	Between	Votes	Weighted	Arazzo
Post new metrics in Datadog for new or updated PagerDuty incidents Post new metrics in Datadog for new or updated PagerDuty incidents	Datadog ↔ PagerDuty	1	0.4	workflow generated by API Evangelist

Generated 2026-10-15 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.