Continuous Integration
Providers using this tag (37)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (11)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Continuous Integration” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 35 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Continuous Integration, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 46.2 | 23.4 | +22.8 | 35 |
| Contract Quality | 31.9 | 19.8 | +12.1 | 35 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.3 | 14 | +10.3 | 35 |
| Access Clarity | 33.9 | 26.5 | +7.4 | 35 |
| Contract Governance | 12 | 6.4 | +5.6 | 35 |
| Discoverability | 66.1 | 61.2 | +4.9 | 35 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 25% | 10% | +15 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 33% | 13% | +20 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 97% | 97% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 22% | 14% | +8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 CloudBees 66.6
- 2 Buildkite 65.2
- 3 Signadot 55
- 4 Amazon CodeBuild 52.9
- 5 Kubeshop 51.8
- 6 CircleCI 49.6
- 7 Opkey 48.9
- 8 Nevercode 47.8
- 9 Semaphore 47.5
- 10 Google Cloud Build 46.9
- 1 Kubeshop 51.8
- 2 CloudBees 44.1
- 3 Limrun 43
- 4 CircleCI 37
- 5 Buildkite 33
- 6 Semaphore 31.3
- 7 Nevercode 30.7
- 8 Amazon CodeBuild 28.1
- 9 Signadot 27.4
- 10 Google Cloud Build 26.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.