Continuous Integration
Providers using this tag (39)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (12)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 39 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Continuous Integration, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 40 | 17.9 | +22.1 | 39 |
| Contract Quality | 31.5 | 17.5 | +14 | 39 |
| Access Clarity | 34.9 | 22.3 | +12.6 | 39 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.2 | 11.3 | +10.9 | 39 |
| Discoverability | 68.1 | 60.4 | +7.7 | 39 |
| Contract Governance | 13.5 | 6.4 | +7.1 | 39 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 36% | 16% | +20 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 23% | 7% | +16 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 9% | +4 |
| Security | 95% | 88% | +7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 13% | +15 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Buildkite 66.5
- 2 GitLab 65.3
- 3 Signadot 54.7
- 4 Kubeshop 54.4
- 5 Amazon CodeBuild 53.5
- 6 Azure Pipelines 52.2
- 7 CircleCI 49.6
- 8 Nevercode 49.5
- 9 Google Cloud Build 48.9
- 10 Opkey 48.5
- 1 Kubeshop 50
- 2 GitLab 47.8
- 3 Limrun 43
- 4 Buildkite 33
- 5 Semaphore 31.3
- 6 Amazon CodeBuild 30.2
- 7 Harness 29.4
- 8 Nevercode 29
- 9 CircleCI 28.3
- 10 Google Cloud Build 26.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/continuous-integration"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/continuous-integration"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/continuous-integration/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.