Pipelines
PipelinePipelines
Providers using this tag (60)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 16 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (161)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 37 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 28 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 40 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 30 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (114)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Pipelines” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 114 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 55 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Pipelines, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 32.7 | 17.6 | +15.1 | 55 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.4 | 13.7 | +10.7 | 55 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.9 | 23.2 | +10.7 | 55 |
| Contract Governance | 12.3 | 6.3 | +6 | 55 |
| Discoverability | 61.9 | 58.1 | +3.8 | 55 |
| Access Clarity | 30.1 | 26.5 | +3.6 | 55 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 25% | 14% | +11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 23% | 12% | +11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 25% | 14% | +11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 GitHub Actions 82.8
- 2 GitHub 80.3
- 3 Buildkite 68
- 4 CircleCI 67.6
- 5 Databricks Asset Bundles 66.5
- 6 Salesloft 63.5
- 7 Talend 63
- 8 Zendesk Sell 60.5
- 9 Pipeliner CRM 57.8
- 10 ZenML 57.2
- 1 Monaco 62.8
- 2 GitHub 59.9
- 3 CircleCI 55.4
- 4 GitLab CI/CD 54.3
- 5 Folk 52.2
- 6 Talend 51.9
- 7 Buildkite 51.4
- 8 GitHub Actions 50
- 9 Attio 46
- 10 Salesloft 44.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.