Providers using this tag (103)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 33 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (31)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 103 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged ETL, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.3 | 17.9 | +25.4 | 103 |
| Contract Quality | 39.4 | 17.5 | +21.9 | 103 |
| Access Clarity | 38.1 | 22.3 | +15.8 | 103 |
| Operational Transparency | 26 | 11.3 | +14.7 | 103 |
| Discoverability | 70 | 60.4 | +9.6 | 103 |
| Contract Governance | 15.4 | 6.4 | +9 | 103 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 44% | 16% | +28 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 22% | 7% | +15 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 9% | +12 |
| Security | 97% | 88% | +9 |
| Arazzo workflows | 12% | 2% | +10 |
| Governance rules | 36% | 13% | +23 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 83.3
- 2 Treasure Data 76.7
- 3 Airbyte 66.6
- 4 Singular 64.4
- 5 Improvado 64.2
- 6 Oneschema 63.6
- 7 Structify 62.6
- 8 Dagster 62.1
- 9 Cloudflare 62
- 10 Databricks 59.1
- 1 Improvado 58.8
- 2 Salesforce 52.2
- 3 Precog 50
- 4 Singular 50
- 5 Treasure Data 48.4
- 6 Oneschema 48
- 7 Funnel 45.7
- 8 Adverity 44.8
- 9 Cloudflare 44.5
- 10 Airbyte 43.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/etl"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/etl"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/etl/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.