Big Data
Providers using this tag (101)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 26 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 26 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (17)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Big Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 79 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Big Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.8 | 23.4 | +12.4 | 79 |
| Contract Quality | 29.3 | 19.8 | +9.5 | 79 |
| Contract Governance | 13.4 | 6.4 | +7 | 79 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.9 | 14 | +6.9 | 79 |
| Access Clarity | 28 | 26.5 | +1.5 | 79 |
| Discoverability | 62.6 | 61.2 | +1.4 | 79 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 10% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 13% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 93% | 97% | -4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 38% | 14% | +24 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Treasure Data 74.3
- 2 Cloudera 64.9
- 3 Azure Databricks 63.4
- 4 Amazon Kinesis 60.3
- 5 Azure Event Hubs 58.6
- 6 Databricks 58.3
- 7 Beaconstac 57.8
- 8 Google Cloud Dataflow 57.5
- 9 Amazon Redshift 56
- 10 Amazon EMR 54.8
- 1 Beaconstac 53.8
- 2 Treasure Data 48.8
- 3 SK Telecom 43.7
- 4 Databricks 40.1
- 5 Azure Databricks 35.2
- 6 Ocient 34.9
- 7 Amazon Redshift 33.7
- 8 Cloudera 32
- 9 Google Cloud Dataflow 31.8
- 10 Infoworks 31.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.