SQL
Providers using this tag (86)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 31 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (92)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 38 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (42)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “SQL” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 85 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged SQL, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 46.3 | 23.2 | +23.1 | 85 |
| Contract Quality | 35.3 | 17.6 | +17.7 | 85 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.4 | 13.7 | +13.7 | 85 |
| Access Clarity | 37.9 | 26.5 | +11.4 | 85 |
| Contract Governance | 12.2 | 6.3 | +5.9 | 85 |
| Discoverability | 63.9 | 58.1 | +5.8 | 85 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 29% | 14% | +15 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 25% | 12% | +13 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 38% | 14% | +24 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 CData 84.4
- 2 Snowflake 82.7
- 3 ClickHouse 73.5
- 4 Cockroach Labs 72
- 5 Dremio | Intelligent Lakehouse Platform 69.4
- 6 Databricks 65.3
- 7 Census 63.1
- 8 Microsoft SQL Server 62.7
- 9 Plinth US Grants Data 60.5
- 10 SingleStore 59.8
- 1 CData 66.5
- 2 ClickHouse 59.6
- 3 data.world 56
- 4 AmunCore 55.6
- 5 Plinth US Grants Data 54.9
- 6 Databricks 51.5
- 7 Dremio | Intelligent Lakehouse Platform 49.9
- 8 Snowflake 45.6
- 9 Cockroach Labs 42
- 10 Skyvia 36.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.