PostgreSQL
PostgreSQLpostgresql
Providers using this tag (33)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (17)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (10)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “PostgreSQL” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged PostgreSQL, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 43 | 19.8 | +23.2 | 29 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.5 | 23.4 | +20.1 | 29 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.2 | 14 | +11.2 | 29 |
| Access Clarity | 37.3 | 26.5 | +10.8 | 29 |
| Discoverability | 68.5 | 61.2 | +7.3 | 29 |
| Contract Governance | 8.9 | 6.4 | +2.5 | 29 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 35% | 10% | +25 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 35% | 13% | +22 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 94% | 97% | -3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 32% | 14% | +18 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 YugabyteDB 61.7
- 2 AI for Database 60.3
- 3 Hatchet 55.7
- 4 AmunCore 54.2
- 5 Timescale 53.3
- 6 Yugabyte 52.3
- 7 listmonk 48
- 8 Google Cloud SQL 46.6
- 9 Azure Database for PostgreSQL 45.1
- 10 Aiven 44.3
- 1 AmunCore 41.5
- 2 YugabyteDB 36.8
- 3 Amazon Aurora DSQL 35.1
- 4 AI for Database 34.9
- 5 Supabase 34.8
- 6 Ardent 32.9
- 7 listmonk 32.3
- 8 Timescale 31.4
- 9 Nhost 30.9
- 10 Amazon Aurora 30.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.