Data Lake
Data LakeDatalake
Providers using this tag (31)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (10)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 31 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Lake, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 41 | 17.5 | +23.5 | 31 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.5 | 17.9 | +20.6 | 31 |
| Access Clarity | 39.9 | 22.3 | +17.6 | 31 |
| Contract Governance | 17 | 6.4 | +10.6 | 31 |
| Discoverability | 69.3 | 60.4 | +8.9 | 31 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.2 | 11.3 | +8.9 | 31 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 29% | 16% | +13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 7% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 9% | +4 |
| Security | 94% | 88% | +6 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 48% | 13% | +35 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cumulocity 63.2
- 2 Amazon S3 60.7
- 3 Amazon Lake Formation 59.4
- 4 Azure Blob Storage 54.3
- 5 Panther 54
- 6 Amazon Security Lake 51.4
- 7 AWS Lake Formation 50.2
- 8 Amazon Redshift 48.4
- 9 Eon 47.6
- 10 SAP HANA 47.6
- 1 Ryft 42.6
- 2 Eon 33.6
- 3 Apache Iceberg 33.5
- 4 Amazon S3 32.7
- 5 lakeFS 32.4
- 6 Panther 30.8
- 7 Amazon Supply Chain 28.8
- 8 SAP HANA 27.7
- 9 Amazon Redshift 25.5
- 10 Amazon Security Lake 24.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.