Storage
STORAGEStoragestorage
Providers using this tag (148)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 41 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 30 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 30 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (181)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 31 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 65 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 48 Limited public surface area
Emerging 24 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (121)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Storage” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 121 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 118 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Storage, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.4 | 23.4 | +17 | 118 |
| Contract Quality | 33.7 | 19.8 | +13.9 | 118 |
| Access Clarity | 32.8 | 26.5 | +6.3 | 118 |
| Contract Governance | 12.5 | 6.4 | +6.1 | 118 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.1 | 14 | +6.1 | 118 |
| Discoverability | 64.6 | 61.2 | +3.4 | 118 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 10% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 13% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 89% | 97% | -8 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 29% | 14% | +15 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Appwrite 80.5
- 2 Amazon Web Services (AWS) 78.2
- 3 NexGen Cloud 64.3
- 4 IBM 60
- 5 Azure Blob Storage 59.1
- 6 Amazon EBS 58.2
- 7 Insforge 57.9
- 8 Amazon EFS 57.4
- 9 Cisco Intersight 55.8
- 10 Amazon DataSync 54.7
- 1 Insforge 57.7
- 2 Appwrite 54.5
- 3 NexGen Cloud 47.2
- 4 StorONE 41.4
- 5 Google Drive 39.6
- 6 IBM 37.3
- 7 Amazon Web Services (AWS) 37.2
- 8 VAST Data 35.1
- 9 Supabase 34.8
- 10 Cisco Intersight 33.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.