Storage
Providers using this tag (154)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 38 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 28 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 47 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 6 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (178)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 37 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 56 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 46 Limited public surface area
Emerging 25 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (122)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Storage” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 122 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
154 providers carry this tag directly, and 200 counting the 2 narrower tags below — 46 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 123 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Storage, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 39.3 | 23.2 | +16.1 | 123 |
| Contract Quality | 29.7 | 17.6 | +12.1 | 123 |
| Operational Transparency | 21 | 13.7 | +7.3 | 123 |
| Access Clarity | 33.8 | 26.5 | +7.3 | 123 |
| Contract Governance | 11.6 | 6.3 | +5.3 | 123 |
| Discoverability | 63 | 58.1 | +4.9 | 123 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 14% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 12% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 14% | +17 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Appwrite 83.2
- 2 Amazon Lightsail 75.3
- 3 Amazon S3 69.7
- 4 IBM 69.1
- 5 NexGen Cloud 65.9
- 6 Google Cloud Storage 65
- 7 Box 61
- 8 Google Workspace 60.5
- 9 Cisco Intersight 59.7
- 10 Amazon EBS 59.2
- 1 Box 58.6
- 2 Insforge 57.7
- 3 Appwrite 54.5
- 4 Supabase 50.6
- 5 NexGen Cloud 44.7
- 6 StorONE 40.1
- 7 Google Drive 39.6
- 8 IBM 36.3
- 9 VAST Data 35.1
- 10 Dropbox 34.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.