Storage
Providers using this tag (160)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 32 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 32 Limited public surface area
Emerging 26 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 49 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 6 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (184)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 12 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 43 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 48 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 51 Limited public surface area
Emerging 27 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (125)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Storage” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 125 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
160 providers carry this tag directly, and 215 counting the 2 narrower tags below — 55 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Object Storage | 69% |
| Data Center Tier Certification (facility certification, open hardware, efficiency bodies) | 20% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 128 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Storage, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.1 | 23.2 | +14.9 | 128 |
| Contract Quality | 27.4 | 17.2 | +10.2 | 128 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.8 | 13 | +7.8 | 128 |
| Access Clarity | 29 | 23.9 | +5.1 | 128 |
| Discoverability | 62.9 | 57.9 | +5 | 128 |
| Contract Governance | 10.8 | 6.5 | +4.3 | 128 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 13% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 12% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 29% | 16% | +13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Appwrite 82.3
- 2 Amazon Lightsail 73.8
- 3 Amazon S3 68.7
- 4 NexGen Cloud 66.5
- 5 IBM 66.4
- 6 Google Cloud Storage 63.5
- 7 Google Workspace 60.4
- 8 Cisco Intersight 60.3
- 9 Amazon Storage Gateway 58.1
- 10 NimbusNexus 58.1
- 1 Insforge 56.6
- 2 Appwrite 53.5
- 3 Supabase 48.1
- 4 NimbusNexus 46.7
- 5 NexGen Cloud 43.3
- 6 Zadara 41.8
- 7 Google Drive 40.8
- 8 StorONE 40.1
- 9 IBM 36.3
- 10 VAST Data 35.9
Coverage caveat. 105 of 128 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.