Backup
Providers using this tag (42)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (37)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (29)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Backup” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 40 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Backup, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 42.4 | 23.2 | +19.2 | 40 |
| Access Clarity | 43.2 | 26.5 | +16.7 | 40 |
| Contract Quality | 32 | 17.6 | +14.4 | 40 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.9 | 13.7 | +11.2 | 40 |
| Contract Governance | 12.7 | 6.3 | +6.4 | 40 |
| Discoverability | 63.4 | 58.1 | +5.3 | 40 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 14% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 12% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 24% | 11% | +13 |
| Security | 95% | 98% | -3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 14% | +17 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon S3 69.7
- 2 Cohesity 69.5
- 3 Couchbase 68.8
- 4 Google Cloud Storage 65
- 5 Amazon Storage Gateway 58.3
- 6 Amazon Data Lifecycle Manager 54.8
- 7 Druva 54.8
- 8 Veritas NetBackup 52.8
- 9 Amazon S3 Glacier 50.7
- 10 Backblaze 48.2
- 1 Druva 58.4
- 2 Cohesity 42.1
- 3 StorONE 40.1
- 4 Veeam 38.4
- 5 Eon 33.6
- 6 Google Cloud Storage 33.1
- 7 Veritas NetBackup 32.3
- 8 Backblaze 32.3
- 9 Amazon Data Lifecycle Manager 30.6
- 10 Couchbase 29.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.