Disaster Recovery
Providers using this tag (39)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (21)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Companies reaching this through an API (8)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Disaster Recovery” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 34 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Disaster Recovery, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 42.4 | 23.4 | +19 | 34 |
| Access Clarity | 40.6 | 26.5 | +14.1 | 34 |
| Contract Quality | 30.1 | 19.8 | +10.3 | 34 |
| Operational Transparency | 21.4 | 14 | +7.4 | 34 |
| Discoverability | 66.3 | 61.2 | +5.1 | 34 |
| Contract Governance | 8.7 | 6.4 | +2.3 | 34 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 10% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 13% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 94% | 97% | -3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 19% | 14% | +5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Acronis 72.9
- 2 Cohesity 66.1
- 3 Veritas NetBackup 52.4
- 4 Druva 52
- 5 Amazon Backup 49.8
- 6 Slide 47.4
- 7 Cutover 45.9
- 8 Eon 43.7
- 9 Azure Site Recovery 43.2
- 10 Datto 43.1
- 1 Druva 56.7
- 2 Acronis 45.9
- 3 Cohesity 41.7
- 4 Veeam 38.4
- 5 Eon 33.6
- 6 Veritas NetBackup 32.3
- 7 Amazon Resilience Hub 30.6
- 8 Unitrends 28.5
- 9 Datto 27.2
- 10 Cutover 26.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.