Disaster Recovery
Providers using this tag (38)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (14)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (7)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Disaster Recovery” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 33 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Disaster Recovery, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.8 | 23.2 | +18.6 | 33 |
| Access Clarity | 35.6 | 23.9 | +11.7 | 33 |
| Operational Transparency | 23.8 | 13 | +10.8 | 33 |
| Contract Quality | 26.4 | 17.2 | +9.2 | 33 |
| Discoverability | 63.2 | 57.9 | +5.3 | 33 |
| Contract Governance | 7.6 | 6.5 | +1.1 | 33 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 13% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 12% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 23% | 11% | +12 |
| Security | 91% | 98% | -7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 16% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Acronis 82.9
- 2 Cohesity 68.4
- 3 Druva 53.7
- 4 Veritas NetBackup 52.7
- 5 Slide 48.3
- 6 Cutover 46.9
- 7 Eon 44.3
- 8 Datto 43.2
- 9 Unitrends 41.4
- 10 Veritas InfoScale 39.8
- 1 Druva 56.2
- 2 Acronis 55.2
- 3 Cohesity 40.8
- 4 Veeam 38.3
- 5 Eon 35.5
- 6 Veritas NetBackup 32.6
- 7 Unitrends 30.7
- 8 Amazon Resilience Hub 30.2
- 9 Datto 27.7
- 10 Cutover 26.1
Coverage caveat. 30 of 33 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.