Amazon Web Services
AWSAmazon Web Services
Providers using this tag (244)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 38 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 114 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 43 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 17 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (44)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (22)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Amazon Web Services” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 236 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Amazon Web Services, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 66.5 | 25 | +41.5 | 236 |
| Contract Quality | 55.9 | 18.2 | +37.7 | 236 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 51.4 | 22.1 | +29.3 | 236 |
| Operational Transparency | 32.4 | 12.4 | +20 | 236 |
| Contract Governance | 24.4 | 9.4 | +15 | 236 |
| Discoverability | 63.6 | 57.9 | +5.7 | 236 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 16% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 14% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 1% | 13% | -12 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 22% | 2% | +20 |
| Governance rules | 95% | 35% | +60 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Amazon Clean Rooms 84.4
- 2 Amazon Pinpoint 83.3
- 3 Amazon DynamoDB 80.9
- 4 Amazon SES 80.6
- 5 Amazon Lex 79.9
- 6 Amazon CodeGuru Profiler 77.3
- 7 Amazon API Gateway 76
- 8 Amazon Lightsail 75.4
- 9 Amazon VPN 74.9
- 10 CloudFront 74.8
- 1 CloudChipr 51.7
- 2 Amazon Nova 50.5
- 3 Archera 50.5
- 4 Amazon EC2 Image Builder 42.9
- 5 Amazon DynamoDB 41.9
- 6 Amazon Outposts 41
- 7 Amazon Web Services 40.8
- 8 Amazon CodeGuru Profiler 40.3
- 9 Amazon Rekognition 39.9
- 10 Amnic 39.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.