FinOps
Providers using this tag (79)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 25 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (51)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 20 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (14)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “FinOps” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
79 providers carry this tag directly, and 80 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 1 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 78 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged FinOps, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 35.8 | 17.6 | +18.2 | 78 |
| Access Clarity | 39 | 26.5 | +12.5 | 78 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.3 | 23.2 | +12.1 | 78 |
| Discoverability | 64.6 | 58.1 | +6.5 | 78 |
| Contract Governance | 11.8 | 6.3 | +5.5 | 78 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.8 | 13.7 | +5.1 | 78 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 35% | 14% | +21 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 34% | 12% | +22 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 35% | 14% | +21 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Densify 69.5
- 2 Azure Cost Management 69
- 3 DoiT 68.4
- 4 Env0 64.6
- 5 Cledara 61.5
- 6 CloudChipr 59.2
- 7 Edgee 58.3
- 8 CloudHealth 57.2
- 9 Paid 56.8
- 10 Amazon Compute Optimizer 54.3
- 1 DoiT 74.4
- 2 CoreStack 55.5
- 3 Schematic 55.3
- 4 CloudChipr 52.6
- 5 Archera 51.3
- 6 Cledara 50
- 7 Snow Software 48.6
- 8 Hyperline 46.3
- 9 Finout 44.6
- 10 Sequence 44.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.