Microsoft Azure
AzureMicrosoft Azure
Providers using this tag (67)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 18 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (42)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (29)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Microsoft Azure” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 64 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Microsoft Azure, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 53.9 | 22.1 | +31.8 | 64 |
| Operational Transparency | 41.3 | 12.4 | +28.9 | 64 |
| Contract Quality | 46.5 | 18.2 | +28.3 | 64 |
| Access Clarity | 51.1 | 25 | +26.1 | 64 |
| Discoverability | 71.5 | 57.9 | +13.6 | 64 |
| Contract Governance | 21.4 | 9.4 | +12 | 64 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 32% | 16% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 27% | 14% | +13 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 67% | 13% | +54 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 11% | 2% | +9 |
| Governance rules | 83% | 35% | +48 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Microsoft Azure API Management 80.3
- 2 Azure Data Factory 78.9
- 3 Microsoft Azure 78.4
- 4 Microsoft Azure Cdn 76.9
- 5 Microsoft Azure Health Data Services 75.2
- 6 Azure Cost Management 73.7
- 7 Microsoft Azure Cache For Redis 72.8
- 8 Azure Kubernetes Service 72.6
- 9 Microsoft Azure Communication Services 71.2
- 10 Azure Stream Analytics 71
- 1 CloudChipr 51.7
- 2 Microsoft Azure 51.5
- 3 Archera 50.5
- 4 Microsoft Azure Communication Services 43.4
- 5 Microsoft Azure Cache For Redis 41.4
- 6 Azure Blob Storage 40.9
- 7 Amnic 39.8
- 8 Microsoft Azure Cdn 38.4
- 9 Veeam 38.3
- 10 Microsoft Azure Health Data Services 37.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.