Microsoft
Providers using this tag (70)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (6)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Microsoft” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 65 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Microsoft, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 50.8 | 23.2 | +27.6 | 65 |
| Access Clarity | 43.9 | 26.5 | +17.4 | 65 |
| Operational Transparency | 29.9 | 13.7 | +16.2 | 65 |
| Contract Quality | 32.1 | 17.6 | +14.5 | 65 |
| Discoverability | 65.4 | 58.1 | +7.3 | 65 |
| Contract Governance | 10.6 | 6.3 | +4.3 | 65 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 18% | 14% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 12% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 37% | 11% | +26 |
| Security | 94% | 98% | -4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 16% | 2% | +14 |
| Governance rules | 40% | 14% | +26 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Power Query 75.8
- 2 Microsoft Azure Cache For Redis 75.1
- 3 Microsoft Power Platform APIs 71.1
- 4 Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales 70.7
- 5 Microsoft Azure Functions 69.4
- 6 Microsoft 69.2
- 7 Microsoft Azure Quantum 68.1
- 8 Microsoft .NET 67.7
- 9 Microsoft Outlook 66
- 10 Microsoft Azure Batch 63.7
- 1 Microsoft Outlook 47.5
- 2 Microsoft Power Platform APIs 44.9
- 3 Microsoft Azure Cache For Redis 40.1
- 4 Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales 39.2
- 5 Microsoft Dynamics NAV 37.3
- 6 Microsoft SharePoint 34.7
- 7 Microsoft Power Automate 34.6
- 8 Power Query 34.5
- 9 Microsoft Azure Batch 34.5
- 10 Microsoft Power Apps 33.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.