Microsoft 365
Providers using this tag (42)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (8)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Microsoft 365” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 38 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Microsoft 365, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 45.5 | 24.5 | +21 | 38 |
| Operational Transparency | 33.9 | 13.2 | +20.7 | 38 |
| Access Clarity | 45.4 | 30 | +15.4 | 38 |
| Contract Quality | 30.4 | 18.6 | +11.8 | 38 |
| Discoverability | 69.5 | 59.1 | +10.4 | 38 |
| Contract Governance | 15 | 9.7 | +5.3 | 38 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 18% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 16% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 36% | 13% | +23 |
| Security | 97% | 99% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 1% | +9 |
| Governance rules | 59% | 36% | +23 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Microsoft Planner 69
- 2 Exclaimer 67.4
- 3 Microsoft Visio API 65.9
- 4 Microsoft Word 65.9
- 5 Microsoft Teams 65.1
- 6 Microsoft 365 Copilot 62.8
- 7 IRONSCALES 62.6
- 8 Microsoft Viva 62.6
- 9 Microsoft Copilot 61.3
- 10 Microsoft Bookings 59.7
- 1 IRONSCALES 50.5
- 2 Microsoft Word 40.8
- 3 Veeam 38.3
- 4 Microsoft Copilot 32.1
- 5 Augmentt 31.4
- 6 UpSlide 30.9
- 7 CloudAlly 30.1
- 8 Exclaimer 30
- 9 Microsoft 365 Copilot 29.4
- 10 Microsoft OneNote 28
Coverage caveat. 21 of 38 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.