CoreView

CoreView provides Microsoft 365 cyber resilience solutions for enterprises, offering tools for policy enforcement, configuration resilience, privilege management, and tenant segmentation. Their platform helps organizations secure, manage, and automate Microsoft 365 environments, delivering risk insights, backup, and compliance across thousands of settings.

CoreView is listed with 3 APIs on the APIs.io network: Connect API, Public API, and Teams API. Tagged areas include Microsoft 365, Tenant Resilience, Configuration Management, Identity Security, and License Optimization.

The CoreView catalog on APIs.io includes 1 JSON-LD context and 1 Spectral governance ruleset.

CoreView’s developer surface includes pricing, changelog, engineering blog, getting-started guide, documentation, and 17 more developer resources.

🌐 Visit website 📡 Profile data on GitHub

31.0/100 thin ▼ -6.5 Agent 16/100 agent aware Heartbeat 88/100 alive Full breakdown ↓
scored 2026-11-06 · rubric v0.27.0 · Show this score on your site →

3 APIs

Microsoft 365Tenant ResilienceConfiguration Management Identity SecurityLicense OptimizationSharePoint ControlEnterprise Saas

Kin Score

Kin Score How this is scored →
scored 2026-11-06 · rubric v0.27.0

Composite quality — 31.0/100 · thin

Contract Quality 3.7 / 19

Developer Ergonomics 2.7 / 15

Access Clarity 5.7 / 15

Operational Transparency 4.1 / 10

Contract Governance 2.0 / 9

Discoverability 5.2 / 8

Regulatory Posture 2.9 / 15

Create-or-Update Ergonomics 0.0 / 10

Agent readiness — 16/100 · agent aware

Machine-Readable Contract 18 / 18

Agentic Access Contract 0 / 10

Documented Reversibility 0 / 6

MCP Server 0 / 12

Machine-Readable Auth 0 / 10

Idempotency 0 / 9

Stable Error Semantics 0 / 8

Request/Response Examples 0 / 7

Rate-Limit Signaling 7 / 7

Typed Event Surface 0 / 6

Agent Skills 0 / 5

Well-Known Catalog 0 / 4

Consent & Bot Identity 0 / 3

A2A Agent Card 0 / 8

Dry-Run / Simulate Mode 0 / 4

Delegated User Identity 0 / 6

Protected Resource Metadata 0 / 5

Registration Without a Human 0 / 6

Agentic Commerce Well-Known Document 0 / 5

Pagination 5 / 5

Distinct Operations 3 / 3

MCP Tool Quality 6 / 6

Regulatory Posture applies to this provider. Its tags matched the Horizontal (data, software, accessibility, platform) regime, so Regulatory Posture carries 15 points of the composite. If this regime is wrong for your business, say so on your provider repo — the applicability map is public and we will correct it.

Create-or-Update Ergonomics applies to this provider. This API accepts writes, so it carries 10 points of the composite. It is scored from the published contracts themselves: whether a caller can create-or-update in one call, whether the write accepts a key the caller already holds, and whether the response says which branch ran. Without that, every write needs a search-and-branch in front of it, and the first time that check is skipped a duplicate record is created. Scored against the observed mean rather than raw — a provider at the catalog average is unchanged by this facet, not penalised by it.

The six quality facets above are damped to 75 points between them, because the conditional facet above carries the other 25. That is why each facet's contribution is shown against a damped maximum: raising a quality facet moves the composite by 75% of its nominal weight, not 100%. The full arithmetic is at apis.io/rating/.

Show this score on your site.

It updates itself when the score changes. Paste this where you link to your API docs:

<a href="https://apis.io/providers/coreview/"><img src="https://apis.io/badge/coreview/card.svg" alt="CoreView on APIs.io — Kin Score by API Evangelist"></a>

Other styles, a README pill and a shields.io endpoint are on the badge page.

Raise your score.

Agent readiness — checks not met, largest first (exact, from this profile):

MCP Server +12 pts — deployment.mode + probe verdict on the mcp/ manifest, not the pointer; an unprobed slug falls back to authorship
Agentic Access Contract +10 pts — agentic_access artifact present (x-agentic-access), graded by author
Machine-Readable Auth +10 pts — a served openid-configuration/oauth-authorization-server carrying `issuer` (served), else the securitySchemes class in the provider OpenAPIs — bound (mutualTLS, DPoP, Signature) > negotiable (oauth2 authorizationCode/clientCredentials, openIdConnect) > bearer (http bearer, apiKey)
Idempotency +9 pts — OpenAPI mutating operations declare an idempotency key — a header, a request-body property, or a named de-duplication token whose own description says so (verified); else common[].type matches /idempoten/i (documented)
Stable Error Semantics +8 pts — OpenAPI $refs a shared error schema across 4xx/5xx responses (verified), else common[].type includes ErrorCatalog / ErrorCodes / DeclineCodes
A2A Agent Card +8 pts — a2a/-a2a.yml manifest, graded on conformance.grade against A2A 1.0.0

11 more unmet checks in the Agent Readiness table above.

Kin Score — facets with the most composite points still available (weight × headroom):

Contract Quality scores 19.7 — up to +20.1 composite points
Developer Ergonomics scores 17.9 — up to +16.4 composite points
Access Clarity scores 38.2 — up to +12.4 composite points

Each check links to what satisfies it. Publish the artifact, or tell us where it already lives, and the score moves on the next scoring run.

Improve this rating by publishing the missing artifacts — every area above can be raised, and the full rubric is at apis.io/rating/. Every facet and dimension name above is a link: it opens that measurement's own page — what it means, the exact checks that feed it, how the whole catalog distributes on it, and the providers at the top of it. This rating is computed from the provider profile at artifacts.apis.io/coreview/apis.yml: open an issue on github.com/api-evangelist/coreview to ask a question or point us at an artifact you publish. Submit an artifact on GitHub — free → Manage your own listing — the Influence plan, $499/mo →

Standards implemented 1

Standards this provider implements or carries. De facto ones are profiled and measured by the API Commons; formal ones come from the standards directory and are linked by the provider's own tags. The evidence column says how each claim was established — not that it was made.

OpenAPI

measured — observed by APIs.io (published)

APIs 3

Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.

CoreView Connect API

The Connect API from CoreView — 1 operation(s) for connect.

CoreView Public API

The Public API from CoreView — 1 operation(s) for public.

CoreView Teams API

The Teams API from CoreView — 1 operation(s) for teams.

CoreView API pricing

Rate limits

Exchange Service parallel request limit: 100 requests to be executed in parallel per application

Rate-limit details →

Rate Limits 1

Documented rate limits and quota policies.

Coreview Rate Limits

1 limits

RATE LIMITS

Service Levels 1

Uptime the provider promises or reports, as SLA4OAI. Read from its own pages; APIs.io runs no monitors.

CoreView

SLA

Semantic Vocabularies 1

JSON-LD contexts and semantic vocabularies used across these APIs.

Coreview Context

3 classes · 7 properties

JSON-LD

Spectral Rules 1

Spectral governance rulesets for linting and validating these APIs.

CoreView API Rules

10 rules · 8 errors 1 warnings 1 info

SPECTRAL

JSON Schema 3

Standalone JSON Schema definitions for this provider's data models.

PostConnectTokenRequest

2 properties

JSON SCHEMA

PostConnectTokenResponse

4 properties

JSON SCHEMA

PostTeamsTeamidChannelsChannelidMessagesRequest

2 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Security Posture 2

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.

Coreview Domain Security

TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DMARC

SECURITY

Coreview Trust Center

SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018, GDPR

SECURITY

Resources

Get Started 1

Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call

GettingStarted

GettingStarted

Documentation 1

Reference material describing how the API behaves

Documentation

Documentation

Design & Contract 5

Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events

Spectral

JSONLD

Vocabulary

DataModel

Conformance

Access & Security 4

Authentication, authorization, and security posture

Compliance

Security

TrustCenter

DomainSecurity

Operate 3

Status, limits, changes, and where to get help

RateLimits

RateLimits

StatusPage

StatusPage

ChangeLog

ChangeLog

Commercial 3

Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use

TermsOfService

TermsOfService

PrivacyPolicy

PrivacyPolicy

Pricing

Pricing

Company 3

The organization behind the API

Newsroom

Newsroom

Blog

Blog

Website

Website

Other 2

Properties that don't map to a standard resource type

Hosts

Hosts

Vendors

Vendors

Source (apis.yml)

aid: coreview
name: CoreView
description: CoreView provides Microsoft 365 cyber resilience solutions for enterprises, offering tools for policy enforcement,
  configuration resilience, privilege management, and tenant segmentation. Their platform helps organizations secure, manage,
  and automate Microsoft 365 environments, delivering risk insights, backup, and compliance across thousands of settings.
url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/api-evangelist/coreview/refs/heads/main/apis.yml
x-type: company
x-source: harvest:secondary-market
x-tier: profiled
x-tier-reason: enrichment pass 2026-10-11 (modular-v1; was harvest)
accessModel:
  pricing: unknown
  onboarding: unknown
  trial: false
  try_now: false
  public: false
  label: Unknown
  confidence: low
  probe_state: unreadable
  source:
  - rate-limits
  - security
  generated: '2026-11-06'
  method: derived
specificationVersion: '0.20'
created: '2026-10-11'
modified: '2026-10-11'
tags:
- Microsoft 365
- Tenant Resilience
- Configuration Management
- Identity Security
- License Optimization
- SharePoint Control
- Enterprise Saas
tags_raw:
- Microsoft 365
- Tenant Resilience
- Configuration Management
- Identity Security
- License Optimization
- SharePoint Control
- Enterprise SaaS
maintainers:
- FN: Kin Lane
  email: kin@apievangelist.com
- FN: APIs.json
  email: info@apis.io
common:
- type: RateLimits
  url: rate-limits/coreview-rate-limits.yml
- type: Spectral
  url: rules/coreview-rules.yml
- type: JSONLD
  url: json-ld/coreview-context.jsonld
- type: Vocabulary
  url: vocabulary/coreview-vocabulary.yml
- type: DataModel
  url: data-model/coreview-data-model.yml
- type: Compliance
  url: https://www.coreview.com/security
- type: Conformance
  url: conformance/coreview-conformance.yml
- type: Hosts
  url: hosts/coreview-hosts.yml
- type: Vendors
  url: vendors/coreview-vendors.yml
- type: TermsOfService
  url: https://www.coreview.com/terms-conditions
- type: StatusPage
  url: https://status.coreview.com/
- type: Security
  url: https://www.coreview.com/security
- type: PrivacyPolicy
  url: https://www.coreview.com/privacy-policy
- type: Pricing
  url: https://www.coreview.com/pricing
- type: Newsroom
  url: https://www.coreview.com/newsroom
- type: ChangeLog
  url: https://help.coreview.com/en_US/release-notes
- type: Blog
  url: https://www.coreview.com/blog
- type: GettingStarted
  url: https://help.coreview.com/en_US/onboarding-process/onboarding-registration
- type: Documentation
  url: https://help.coreview.com/
- type: TrustCenter
  url: security/coreview-trust-center.yml
- type: DomainSecurity
  url: security/coreview-domain-security.yml
- type: Website
  url: https://www.coreview.com/
apis:
- aid: coreview:coreview-connect-api
  name: CoreView Connect API
  description: The Connect API from CoreView — 1 operation(s) for connect.
  humanURL: https://help.coreview.com/en_US/public-api-documentation/api-authentication
  baseURL: https://apiproxy.coreview.com
  tags:
  - Connect
  properties:
  - type: OpenAPI
    url: openapi/coreview-connect-api-openapi.yml
  - type: JSONSchema
    url: json-schema/coreview-post-connect-token-request-schema.json
  - type: JSONSchema
    url: json-schema/coreview-post-teams-teamid-channels-channelid-messages-request-schema.json
  - type: JSONSchema
    url: json-schema/coreview-post-connect-token-response-schema.json
- aid: coreview:coreview-public-api
  name: CoreView Public API
  description: The Public API from CoreView — 1 operation(s) for public.
  humanURL: https://help.coreview.com/en_US/public-api-documentation/api-authentication
  baseURL: https://apiproxy.coreview.com
  tags:
  - Public
  properties:
  - type: OpenAPI
    url: openapi/coreview-public-api-openapi.yml
  - type: JSONSchema
    url: json-schema/coreview-post-connect-token-request-schema.json
  - type: JSONSchema
    url: json-schema/coreview-post-teams-teamid-channels-channelid-messages-request-schema.json
  - type: JSONSchema
    url: json-schema/coreview-post-connect-token-response-schema.json
- aid: coreview:coreview-teams-api
  name: CoreView Teams API
  description: The Teams API from CoreView — 1 operation(s) for teams.
  humanURL: https://help.coreview.com/en_US/public-api-documentation/api-authentication
  baseURL: https://apiproxy.coreview.com
  tags:
  - Team
  tags_raw:
  - Teams
  properties:
  - type: OpenAPI
    url: openapi/coreview-teams-api-openapi.yml
  - type: JSONSchema
    url: json-schema/coreview-post-connect-token-request-schema.json
  - type: JSONSchema
    url: json-schema/coreview-post-teams-teamid-channels-channelid-messages-request-schema.json
  - type: JSONSchema
    url: json-schema/coreview-post-connect-token-response-schema.json
x-coverage:
  state: unreadable
  reason: no-machine-readable-spec
  detail: Helpjuice knowledge base provides API documentation but no machine‑readable spec such as OpenAPI, GraphQL or AsyncAPI.
  evidence:
  - url: https://help.coreview.com/en_US/api
    status: 200
  checked: '2026-10-11'
x-enrichment:
  date: '2026-10-11'
  status: enriched
  artifacts_added: 16
  pass: modular-v1
  engine: identity=local,contract=local,surfaces=local,docs=local,regulatory=local

CoreView API — frequently asked questions

Does CoreView have an API?

Yes. APIs.io lists 3 APIs from CoreView, including CoreView Connect API, CoreView Public API and CoreView Teams API.

Is there an OpenAPI specification for the CoreView API?

Yes. APIs.io indexes 3 OpenAPI specifications for CoreView, each linked for download from this page.

Is the CoreView API ready for AI agents?

CoreView has a Kin Score of 31.0 out of 100 (thin) and an Agent Readiness score of 15.5 (agent-aware), scored by API Evangelist on 2026-11-06.

Work with this as data

Every provider here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for providers

9 MCP tools reach this

find_providersBrowse and filter every provider in the catalog.
get_provider_artifactsEvery artifact this provider publishes, grouped by type.
get_provider_operationsEvery operation across all of their OpenAPIs — one call instead of parsing every spec.
get_provider_toolsEvery MCP tool they ship, with the operation each wraps.
get_provider_evidenceHow each part of their score was established. Free — the basis for a claim should not sit behind it.
get_provider_ratingPRO — composite, band, trend and facet scores.
apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.

All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page

This provider

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/coreview"

All providers

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers?limit=25"

Every operation they expose

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/coreview/operations?limit=25"

How their score was established

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/coreview/evidence"

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

GitHub Google LinkedIn

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.