Configuration Management
Configuration ManagementConfigurationManagement
Providers using this tag (43)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (21)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 43 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Configuration Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 42.1 | 17.5 | +24.6 | 43 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.1 | 17.9 | +17.2 | 43 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.3 | 11.3 | +13 | 43 |
| Access Clarity | 34.5 | 22.3 | +12.2 | 43 |
| Contract Governance | 13.6 | 6.4 | +7.2 | 43 |
| Discoverability | 66.3 | 60.4 | +5.9 | 43 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 16% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 7% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 9% | +7 |
| Security | 93% | 88% | +5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 12% | 2% | +10 |
| Governance rules | 56% | 13% | +43 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ServiceNow 64.8
- 2 Palo Alto Networks 63.7
- 3 Chef Software 57.6
- 4 Temenos 55.1
- 5 Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Management 53.5
- 6 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 49.8
- 7 SolarWinds 49.8
- 8 Infoblox 49.6
- 9 Amazon Config 49.1
- 10 OpsMill 48.6
- 1 Palo Alto Networks 39.4
- 2 ServiceNow 35.3
- 3 OpsMill 30.1
- 4 SolarWinds 28.4
- 5 Apollo Config 26.4
- 6 Apache ZooKeeper 25.8
- 7 Ansible 25
- 8 F5 Networks 24.8
- 9 Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Management 24.8
- 10 Red Hat Satellite 24.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/configuration-management"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/configuration-management"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/configuration-management/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.