Infrastructure as Code
Providers using this tag (47)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (25)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
IBM Cloud ProjectsConfigure, deploy, and govern infrastructure as code resources at scale using projects for managed deployme...IBM Cloud SchematicsUse Terraform and Ansible to automate the provisioning and configuration management of IBM Cloud resources ...Speakeasy Terraform GenerationTurn your OpenAPI spec into a production-ready Terraform provider without the manual work. Automatically ke...OCI Resource Manager APIREST APIs for automating infrastructure provisioning using Terraform configurations in Oracle Cloud Infrast...F5 BIG-IP Application Services 3 Extension APIDeclarative API for automating layer 4-7 application services on BIG-IP using JSON declarations. AS3 enable...F5 Declarative Onboarding APIDeclarative API for automating layer 1-3 BIG-IP onboarding and initial device configuration using JSON decl...Databricks Asset Bundles APIThe Databricks Asset Bundles API provides CLI-driven endpoints for initializing, validating, deploying, run...Env0env0 is an infrastructure-as-code automation platform providing cost estimation, policy enforcement, and se...Genesys Infrastructure as Code APIAccelerated infrastructure configuration via reusable modulesLinode Terraform ProviderThe Linode Terraform Provider enables infrastructure-as-code management of Akamai Connected Cloud resources...
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Stainless Terraform ProvidersStainless generates production-ready Terraform providers from an OpenAPI specification, enabling infrastruc...Red Hat Satellite Ansible CollectionThe redhat.satellite Ansible collection provides modules, roles, and plugins for automating Red Hat Satelli...Spacelift GraphQL APISpacelift exposes a GraphQL API for programmatic control of all platform resources including stacks, runs, ...
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
SC//HyperCore REST APIOn-appliance REST API exposed by every SC//HyperCore (HC3) clustered node for automating virtual machines, ...OpenStack Orchestration (Heat) APIHeat is the OpenStack orchestration service that manages infrastructure-as-code deployments via HOT (Heat O...Rubrik Polaris Terraform ProviderTerraform provider for managing Rubrik Security Cloud (Polaris) resources as infrastructure-as-code.Scalr IaC Management APIThe Scalr IaC Management API (TFC-compatible) provides programmatic control over workspaces, environments, ...PackerOpen-source tool for creating identical machine images for multiple platforms from a single source configur...Flightcontrol Config-as-CodeVersion-controlled flightcontrol.json (or flightcontrol.cue) declaring environments, services, regions, sou...
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
HashiCorp TerraformTerraform is an infrastructure as code tool that lets you build, change, and version infrastructure safely ...OpenTofu CLIOpenTofu is a CLI-driven infrastructure-as-code tool forked from Terraform. The opentofu binary reads Hashi...Specific PlatformThe Specific control plane and CLI that builds, deploys and runs agent-defined infrastructure from a single...Deployment and Release APIsAPIs for CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure provisioning, environment management, feature flags, and progressi...KustomizeKustomize is a Kubernetes-native configuration management tool that lets you customize untemplated YAML fil...
Companies reaching this through an API (13)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Infrastructure as Code” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
F5
Flightcontrol
Genesys
Harness
HashiCorp
IBM
OpenStack
Oracle
Red Hat Satellite
Rubrik
Software Development Lifecycle
Speakeasy
Stainless
Score breakdown
Frequency
49.6
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.1
spread across providers
Quality lift
37.9
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
8.5
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Terraform 16 co-occurrences
Configuration Management 11 co-occurrences
Ansible 6 co-occurrences
DevOps 29 co-occurrences
Orchestration 11 co-occurrences
Deployment 16 co-occurrences
Platform Engineering 5 co-occurrences
Hosts 5 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag48
Api tag25
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 46 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Infrastructure as Code, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
46
of 47 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
36.9
+14.7 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
19
+7 vs catalog 12
Spread
5–65
median 35.7 · σ 17.2
How the 46 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 10Developing 10Thin 12Emerging 10Minimal 4
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 46.9 | 23.2 | +23.7 | 46 |
| Operational Transparency | 29.6 | 13 | +16.6 | 46 |
| Contract Quality | 31.4 | 17.2 | +14.2 | 46 |
| Access Clarity | 31.1 | 23.9 | +7.2 | 46 |
| Contract Governance | 13.1 | 6.5 | +6.6 | 46 |
| Discoverability | 62.8 | 57.9 | +4.9 | 46 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 35% | 13% | +22 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 33% | 12% | +21 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 96% | 98% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 33% | 16% | +17 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Databricks Asset Bundles 65
- 2 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 65
- 3 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN 63.8
- 4 Env0 63.1
- 5 Koyeb 62
- 6 Chronosphere 60.9
- 7 Amazon CloudFormation 59.9
- 8 Chef Software 58.7
- 9 Amazon Proton 56.5
- 10 Modal 56.2
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Chronosphere 55.4
- 2 Koyeb 42
- 3 Scale Computing 35.5
- 4 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 35
- 5 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN 33.3
- 6 Modal 33
- 7 Luther Systems 31.7
- 8 Env0 30.3
- 9 Terraform 30.3
- 10 Amazon Proton 30
All 47 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 46 carry a score (98%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 36 of 46 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 36 of 46 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.