IT Operations
Providers using this tag (42)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (4)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “IT Operations” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 38 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged IT Operations, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 39.6 | 26.5 | +13.1 | 38 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 32.8 | 23.4 | +9.4 | 38 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.7 | 14 | +8.7 | 38 |
| Contract Quality | 26.8 | 20.1 | +6.7 | 38 |
| Contract Governance | 11.5 | 6.5 | +5 | 38 |
| Discoverability | 64.9 | 61 | +3.9 | 38 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 10% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 26% | 13% | +13 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 11% | +7 |
| Security | 97% | 96% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 13% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 BigPanda 69.9
- 2 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 63
- 3 Moogsoft 59.3
- 4 Iru 58.2
- 5 ScienceLogic 56.8
- 6 7SIGNAL 52.7
- 7 JAMF 48.3
- 8 ilert 47
- 9 NinjaOne 46.9
- 10 Cutover 45.9
- 1 7SIGNAL 53.4
- 2 BigPanda 52.8
- 3 ScienceLogic 49.6
- 4 Moogsoft 45.8
- 5 NinjaOne 37.9
- 6 Iru 35.7
- 7 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 32.7
- 8 BetterCloud 30.6
- 9 Nexthink 29
- 10 Datto 27.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.