AIOps
AIOpsai-ops
Providers using this tag (50)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (39)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 26 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “AIOps” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 49 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged AIOps, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 45.8 | 23.4 | +22.4 | 49 |
| Access Clarity | 42.9 | 26.5 | +16.4 | 49 |
| Operational Transparency | 29.9 | 14 | +15.9 | 49 |
| Contract Quality | 34.2 | 19.8 | +14.4 | 49 |
| Discoverability | 66.8 | 61.2 | +5.6 | 49 |
| Contract Governance | 11.2 | 6.4 | +4.8 | 49 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 36% | 10% | +26 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 38% | 13% | +25 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Honeycomb 80.6
- 2 Soda 71.6
- 3 Akuity 71.5
- 4 BigPanda 70.3
- 5 FireHydrant 65.5
- 6 Logz.io 64.9
- 7 Groundcover 61.2
- 8 Moogsoft 61.2
- 9 ScienceLogic 59.5
- 10 Metaplane 59.4
- 1 Chronosphere 56.6
- 2 Deployxa 56.3
- 3 Groundcover 50
- 4 ScienceLogic 47.9
- 5 Honeycomb 47.1
- 6 RunWhen 42.6
- 7 BigPanda 41
- 8 7SIGNAL 40.1
- 9 Soda 35.9
- 10 FireHydrant 34.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.