Markets · bedrock market · provisional

Observability

Standards market (opentelemetry) plus platform catalogs. The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.

25providers measured
6 (24.0%)declare their own
13 (52.0%)covered by others only
3 (12.0%)distribution only (sell through, not integrations)
3 (12.0%)undeclared
1declare compatibility (report only, not weighted)
5in-market workflows shown
Provisional. Provisional and unweighted: the Market layer is not part of the composite or agent readiness. Leader lists are read within a position, never as one ranking. A provider that declares nothing we can read is shown as undeclared, with no number: we never infer integrations.

Where this market publishes its structure

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 2 · other companies invest to build on it

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Splunk 53.3 1860 1307 / 553 396 0 5 partner-built 70%, provider-built 8%, unknown 21%
Grafana 51.9 316 185 / 131 0 2 0 partner-built 65%, provider-built 34%, distribution 1%

standard 13 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Sumo Logic 37.7 3 0 / 3 0 2 0 standard 33%, distribution 67%
LogicMonitor 37.1 3 0 / 3 0 2 0 standard 33%, distribution 67%
Logz.io 37.1 3 0 / 3 0 2 0 standard 33%, distribution 67%
Chronosphere 27.5 thin 2 0 / 2 0 1 0 standard 50%, distribution 50%
Embrace 23.0 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Honeycomb 21.1 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Dynatrace 18.5 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Better Stack 17.9 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Bugsnag 17.9 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Lightstep 17.9 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
Sentry 17.9 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
SigNoz 17.9 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%
ThousandEyes 17.9 thin 1 0 / 1 0 0 0 standard 100%

core 3 · builds the connectors its customers need

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
New Relic 70.9 754 53 / 701 32 3 0 partner-built 12%, provider-built 84%, unknown 4%
Datadog 52.1 604 162 / 442 47 0 30 partner-built 26%, provider-built 62%, ipaas-bridge 5%, unknown 7%
Elastic 47.0 439 0 / 439 44 0 0 partner-built 6%, provider-built 85%, unknown 9%

long-tail 1 · reached only through iPaaS bridges

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
PagerDuty 8.7 31 0 / 31 0 0 30 ipaas-bridge 100%

distribution 3 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
ControlUp 19.2 thin 2 0 / 2 0 2 0 distribution 100%
BigPanda 9.6 thin 1 0 / 1 0 1 0 distribution 100%
ScienceLogic 9.6 thin 1 0 / 1 0 1 0 distribution 100%

undeclared 3 · declares nothing we can read: no number

ProviderDepthIntegrationsIn / outUnknown builderDistributioniPaaS bridgeMix
Axiom undeclared-----
FireHydrant undeclared-----
Moesif undeclared-----

Top workflows by market votes

Workflows (Arazzo) and their phrasing are generated by API Evangelist, ranked by market votes (integration edges in the graph, weighted by channel).

In-market workflows only: a step on the market provider's side maps to this market's business capabilities (BC-4220, BC-600.40, BC-620.30), and the partner is not a generic export/notify app (slack, microsoft-teams, pagerduty count as in-market here). Other workflows are counted as bridges (including any whose steps do not resolve to a capability yet). Methodology. In-market: 5; bridges: 0.

WorkflowBetweenVotesWeightedArazzo
Slack
Datadog ↔ Slack 2 1.3 workflow generated by API Evangelist
Trigger PagerDuty incidents for new messages in Slack
Trigger PagerDuty incidents for new messages in Slack
PagerDuty ↔ Slack 2 0.8 workflow generated by API Evangelist
Update Slack channel topic with on-call user from PagerDuty
Update Slack channel topic with on-call user from PagerDuty
PagerDuty ↔ Slack 2 0.8 workflow generated by API Evangelist
Post new metrics in Datadog for new or updated PagerDuty incidents
Post new metrics in Datadog for new or updated PagerDuty incidents
Datadog ↔ PagerDuty 1 0.4 workflow generated by API Evangelist
Slack
Splunk ↔ Slack 1 0.4 workflow generated by API Evangelist

Generated 2026-10-13 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.