Observability

Where this market publishes its structure

• OpenTelemetry vendors, distributions and registry machine-readable
• Datadog integrations-core and extras machine-readable
• New Relic Instant Observability machine-readable
• Grafana plugin catalog machine-readable
• Splunkbase machine-readable
• Elastic Package Registry machine-readable
• Dynatrace Hub not machine-readable: client-rendered
• PagerDuty integrations not machine-readable: client-rendered

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-23 from the 25 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

gravity 3 · other companies invest to build on it

builds-on 14 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

standard 3 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

core 3 · builds the connectors its customers need

mixed 1 · no single mode dominates

undeclared 1 · declares nothing we can read: no number

Top workflows by market votes

Workflows (Arazzo) and their phrasing are generated by API Evangelist, ranked by market votes (integration edges in the graph, weighted by channel).

In-market workflows only: a step on the market provider's side maps to this market's business capabilities (BC-4220, BC-600.40, BC-620.30), and the partner is not a generic export/notify app (slack, microsoft-teams, pagerduty count as in-market here). Other workflows are counted as bridges (including any whose steps do not resolve to a capability yet). Methodology. In-market: 8; bridges: 0.