Metrics
METRICSMetricsmetrics
Providers using this tag (50)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (336)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 21 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 72 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 135 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 90 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (291)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Metrics” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 291 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 50 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Metrics, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 49.2 | 23.4 | +25.8 | 50 |
| Contract Quality | 44.3 | 19.8 | +24.5 | 50 |
| Operational Transparency | 35 | 13.9 | +21.1 | 50 |
| Access Clarity | 40.8 | 26.5 | +14.3 | 50 |
| Contract Governance | 14.9 | 6.4 | +8.5 | 50 |
| Discoverability | 69.2 | 61.2 | +8 | 50 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 34% | 10% | +24 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 34% | 13% | +21 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 98% | 96% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 14% | 2% | +12 |
| Governance rules | 36% | 14% | +22 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Google Analytics 69
- 2 Logz.io 64.9
- 3 GitHub Copilot 64.1
- 4 HyperDX 63.3
- 5 Embrace 61.4
- 6 Groundcover 61.2
- 7 Splunk Observability Cloud 60.8
- 8 Dash0 59.9
- 9 Elastic Observability 58.4
- 10 Azure Monitor 58.2
- 1 Dash0 57.7
- 2 Chronosphere 56.6
- 3 Superlog 52.9
- 4 Embrace 52.2
- 5 Groundcover 50
- 6 Rill Data 40.6
- 7 Google Analytics 40.3
- 8 GitHub Copilot 38.5
- 9 HyperDX 35.9
- 10 SigNoz 35.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.