Observability
Providers using this tag (338)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 11 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 44 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 114 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 83 Limited public surface area
Emerging 56 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 25 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 5 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (238)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 19 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 76 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 67 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 54 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (89)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Observability” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 89 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 324 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Observability, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 45.6 | 23.4 | +22.2 | 324 |
| Contract Quality | 39 | 19.8 | +19.2 | 324 |
| Operational Transparency | 30 | 14 | +16 | 324 |
| Access Clarity | 40.3 | 26.5 | +13.8 | 324 |
| Discoverability | 67.7 | 61.2 | +6.5 | 324 |
| Contract Governance | 11.2 | 6.4 | +4.8 | 324 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 34% | 10% | +24 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 38% | 13% | +25 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 27% | 14% | +13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Dynatrace 86.5
- 2 Honeycomb 80.6
- 3 Datadog APM 79.3
- 4 LaunchDarkly 77.9
- 5 Elastic Stack (ELK Stack) 76.7
- 6 Relevance AI 72.4
- 7 ThousandEyes 71.2
- 8 Checkly 71.1
- 9 BigPanda 70.3
- 10 New Relic 68.1
- 1 Lucent 61
- 2 Relevance AI 60.3
- 3 APIContext 60.1
- 4 Checkly 60
- 5 Dash0 57.7
- 6 Chronosphere 56.6
- 7 Datadog APM 56.3
- 8 ThousandEyes 56.3
- 9 Acceldata 56.3
- 10 Better Stack 55.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.