Dashboards
Dashboardsdashboards
Providers using this tag (63)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (124)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 39 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 41 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 21 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (85)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Dashboards” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 85 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 63 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Dashboards, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 45 | 23.4 | +21.6 | 63 |
| Access Clarity | 46.4 | 26.5 | +19.9 | 63 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.3 | 14 | +16.3 | 63 |
| Contract Quality | 34 | 19.8 | +14.2 | 63 |
| Contract Governance | 11.6 | 6.4 | +5.2 | 63 |
| Discoverability | 66.2 | 61.2 | +5 | 63 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 27% | 10% | +17 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 27% | 13% | +14 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 33% | 14% | +19 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Losant 79.5
- 2 Power BI 64.8
- 3 Datadog 63.6
- 4 HyperDX 63.3
- 5 ThingsBoard 62.3
- 6 Adafruit IO 61.3
- 7 Splunk Observability Cloud 60.8
- 8 AI for Database 60.3
- 9 Grafana 57.5
- 10 Amazon QuickSight 57.3
- 1 Losant 62.3
- 2 Equals 56.1
- 3 Rill Data 40.6
- 4 Datadog 38.3
- 5 Google Looker Studio 36.9
- 6 HyperDX 35.9
- 7 Tableau 35.2
- 8 Kibana 35.2
- 9 SigNoz 35.1
- 10 AI for Database 34.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.