Reports
Reportsreports
Providers using this tag (355)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 16 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 62 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 146 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 108 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (375)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 19 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 65 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 151 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 118 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 355 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Reports, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 53.8 | 17.5 | +36.3 | 355 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 42.6 | 17.9 | +24.7 | 355 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.4 | 11.3 | +19.1 | 355 |
| Access Clarity | 41.2 | 22.3 | +18.9 | 355 |
| Discoverability | 73.7 | 60.4 | +13.3 | 355 |
| Contract Governance | 17.2 | 6.4 | +10.8 | 355 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 39% | 16% | +23 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 7% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 29% | 9% | +20 |
| Security | 99% | 88% | +11 |
| Arazzo workflows | 12% | 2% | +10 |
| Governance rules | 43% | 13% | +30 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 83.3
- 2 Stripe 83.2
- 3 Mailchimp 81.5
- 4 SendPulse 75.7
- 5 Awin 72.6
- 6 Agorapulse 71.4
- 7 MethodFi 71.4
- 8 SimilarWeb 71
- 9 Cogny 70.7
- 10 Efí Pay (Gerencianet) 70.6
- 1 DoiT 74.4
- 2 Adobe Analytics 66.5
- 3 Terabase Energy 60.6
- 4 Extole 57.2
- 5 SendPulse 55.8
- 6 Cogny 55.4
- 7 Tabs 55.2
- 8 Omnisend 54.3
- 9 VideoAmp 53.1
- 10 Factset 52.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/reports"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/reports"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/reports/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.