Business Intelligence
BIBusiness Intelligence
Providers using this tag (173)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 38 Limited public surface area
Emerging 36 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 37 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 5 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (38)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 12 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (22)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Business Intelligence” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
173 providers carry this tag directly, and 176 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 3 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 153 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Business Intelligence, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.4 | 23.2 | +15.2 | 153 |
| Access Clarity | 40.3 | 26.5 | +13.8 | 153 |
| Operational Transparency | 23 | 13.7 | +9.3 | 153 |
| Contract Quality | 23 | 17.6 | +5.4 | 153 |
| Discoverability | 61.9 | 58.1 | +3.8 | 153 |
| Contract Governance | 9.1 | 6.3 | +2.8 | 153 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 36% | 14% | +22 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 35% | 12% | +23 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 96% | 98% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Power Query 75.8
- 2 Qlik Sense 72
- 3 Sigma Computing 71.9
- 4 TextQL 69.5
- 5 Adobe Analytics 69
- 6 Power BI 67.5
- 7 Improvado 65.4
- 8 Visier 64.4
- 9 AI for Database 60.2
- 10 Fundz 60.2
- 1 Adobe Analytics 64
- 2 TextQL 63.6
- 3 Mavenlink 61.3
- 4 Sigma Computing 59.5
- 5 Datarails 56.7
- 6 Equals 56.1
- 7 Hex 53.3
- 8 Improvado 53.2
- 9 Funnel 48.7
- 10 Crystal Reports 48.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.