Business Intelligence
Providers using this tag (170)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 42 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 33 Limited public surface area
Emerging 40 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 27 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (101)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 74 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (18)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Business Intelligence” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 148 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Business Intelligence, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.1 | 23.4 | +16.7 | 148 |
| Access Clarity | 41.9 | 26.5 | +15.4 | 148 |
| Operational Transparency | 23.4 | 14 | +9.4 | 148 |
| Contract Quality | 26.4 | 19.8 | +6.6 | 148 |
| Discoverability | 65.5 | 61.2 | +4.3 | 148 |
| Contract Governance | 10.2 | 6.4 | +3.8 | 148 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 29% | 10% | +19 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 34% | 13% | +21 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 93% | 97% | -4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Power Query 80
- 2 Qlik Sense APIs 70.5
- 3 Sigma Computing 68.8
- 4 TextQL 66.6
- 5 Adobe Analytics 65.9
- 6 Power BI 64.8
- 7 Fundz 63.3
- 8 Improvado 61.9
- 9 Visier 61.3
- 10 AI for Database 60.3
- 1 Adobe Analytics 64
- 2 TextQL 63.6
- 3 Datarails 59.2
- 4 Equals 56.1
- 5 Improvado 53.2
- 6 Mavenlink 51.5
- 7 Funnel 50.9
- 8 Sigma Computing 45.5
- 9 Adverity 44.8
- 10 Factiva 43.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.