Embedded Analytics
Providers using this tag (25)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Embedded Analytics” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 24 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Embedded Analytics, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 52.7 | 23.4 | +29.3 | 24 |
| Operational Transparency | 29.9 | 14 | +15.9 | 24 |
| Access Clarity | 42.1 | 26.5 | +15.6 | 24 |
| Contract Quality | 29.5 | 19.8 | +9.7 | 24 |
| Discoverability | 69.5 | 61.2 | +8.3 | 24 |
| Contract Governance | 9 | 6.4 | +2.6 | 24 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 33% | 10% | +23 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 46% | 13% | +33 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 8% | 14% | -6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Qlik Sense APIs 70.5
- 2 Sigma Computing 68.8
- 3 Omni 58.9
- 4 ThoughtSpot 56.2
- 5 Keen 51
- 6 Tellius 49.1
- 7 Pyramid Analytics 46.4
- 8 Zenlytic 43
- 9 Embeddable 42.4
- 10 Omni Analytics 41.3
- 1 Sigma Computing 45.5
- 2 Qlik Sense APIs 41.9
- 3 ThoughtSpot 39.4
- 4 Omni 33.9
- 5 Zenlytic 30
- 6 Sisense 28.4
- 7 Holistics 28.4
- 8 Tellius 28
- 9 Pyramid Analytics 25.2
- 10 Keen 19.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.