emerging · -0.2 market domain

Data Visualization

Score 22.6 / 100 42 providers +4 via APIs 8 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (42)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored

APIs with this tag (8)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area

Companies reaching this through an API (4)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Data Visualization” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Circana CoreLogic Australia Oracle Salesforce

Score breakdown

Frequency
46.5
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.1
spread across providers
Quality lift
39.5
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
18.8
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Where this tag sits

Analytics broader

Related tags

Business Intelligence 33 co-occurrences Embedded Analytics 10 co-occurrences Dashboards 20 co-occurrences Visualization 6 co-occurrences Charts 5 co-occurrences Data Sources 6 co-occurrences JavaScript 11 co-occurrences Embeddings 6 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag42
Api tag8

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 37 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Visualization, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
37
all scored
Mean Kin Score
35.5
+12.6 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
15.7
+3.8 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.4–72
median 34.5 · σ 13.3
How the 37 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 1Developing 11Thin 17Emerging 5Minimal 2
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 48.1 23.2 +24.9 37
Operational Transparency 27.4 13.7 +13.7 37
Access Clarity 36.9 26.5 +10.4 37
Contract Quality 26.2 17.6 +8.6 37
Discoverability 62.1 58.1 +4 37
Contract Governance 7.7 6.3 +1.4 37

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 24% 14% +10
MCP server (first-party) 21% 12% +9
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 13% 11% +2
Security 97% 98% -1
Arazzo workflows 3% 2% +1
Governance rules 21% 14% +7

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Qlik Sense 72
  2. 2 Looker Studio 55.1
  3. 3 SAP BI Tools 52.2
  4. 4 Tableau 50.9
  5. 5 Tako 49.5
  6. 6 Looker 49.4
  7. 7 Plotly 49
  8. 8 Graphy 46.9
  9. 9 Pyramid Analytics 46.8
  10. 10 Google Looker 45.6
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Tableau 47.1
  2. 2 Qlik Sense 43.6
  3. 3 Tako 43.2
  4. 4 Qlik Sense Enterprise 33.3
  5. 5 Looker Studio 31.8
  6. 6 Looker 26.8
  7. 7 Plotly 26.3
  8. 8 SAP BI Tools 26.1
  9. 9 Graphy 26.1
  10. 10 Pyramid Analytics 25.2
All 42 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/data-visualization"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/data-visualization"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/data-visualization/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.