emerging · -1.3 capabilitymarket resourcedomain

Visualization

Score 20.4 / 100 30 providers +35 via APIs 48 APIs Search apis.io →
Variants seen in the corpus: VisualizationsVisualization

Providers using this tag (30)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (48)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Looker Studio Visualization APIOperations for loading and rendering community visualizations in Looker Studio reports.54.1SAP Lumira Discovery Extensions APIJavaScript API for creating custom visualizations and extensions in SAP Lumira.52.6Dataiku JavaScript APIJavaScript API for building custom web applications that read from Dataiku datasets within DSS.51.8Soracom Lagoon APIManage Soracom Lagoon (managed Grafana) subscription, plan tier, organization, dashboards, users, licenses,...51.5Aerial View APICreate and display photorealistic 3D aerial view videos rendered using Google geospatial imagery.51.3ThingSpeak Charts APIServer-rendered chart embeds for any channel/field — line, bar, column, spline — with parameters for color,...50.9ThingSpeak MATLAB Visualization APIGenerate custom plots from MATLAB code and embed them on ThingSpeak channel pages or external dashboards. S...50.9INRIX Traffic Tiles APIPre-rendered raster traffic tiles for map overlays, addressed by quadkey and rendered from live INRIX speed...50.2Tableau Embedding APIJavaScript API for embedding Tableau visualizations in web applications with advanced interaction capabilit...49.9Looker Studio Community VisualizationsCommunity Visualizations allow developers to build and share custom JavaScript visualizations in Looker Stu...48.6Redis InsightRedis Insight is a free GUI management tool for Redis. Provides database browsing, query execution, memory ...47.4Cenevo Visualizations APIThe Visualizations API from Cenevo — 2 operation(s) for visualizations.41.8QlikView JavaScript APIJavaScript API library for building websites containing QlikView content and for developing custom extensio...40.2
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (35)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Visualization” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Azure Databricks Bentley Systems Cenevo CHAOSS Copernicus Marine CourtListener Databricks Dataiku Descartes Labs Dune Analytics Elastic Stack FIS Global Geneos GoodData Google Maps Platform HERE INRIX Labguru Looker Studio NASA Earthdata Overture Maps Foundation Pixxel Planet Labs PubChem Qlik Sense Qlik Sense Enterprise QlikView Quantum Machines Redis SAP BI Tools Soracom StatsBomb (Hudl) Tableau TensorFlow ThingSpeak

Score breakdown

Frequency
52.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
30.2
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
7.6
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Data Visualization 13 co-occurrences Tiles 7 co-occurrences Embedded Analytics 6 co-occurrences Dashboards 20 co-occurrences Rendering 6 co-occurrences Business Intelligence 14 co-occurrences Extensions 7 co-occurrences Experiments 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag31
Api tag48
Openapi tag9
Openapi op tag36

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 25 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Visualization, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
25
of 30 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
34.2
+12.0 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
17.5
+5.5 vs catalog 12
Spread
3.9–77.6
median 30.3 · σ 22.3
How the 25 split by band
Exemplar 2Strong 3Developing 4Thin 5Emerging 8Minimal 3
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 33.9 17.2 +16.7 25
Developer Ergonomics 36.9 23.2 +13.7 25
Operational Transparency 22.8 13 +9.8 25
Access Clarity 32.9 23.9 +9 25
Discoverability 61.8 57.9 +3.9 25
Contract Governance 10.3 6.5 +3.8 25

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 16% 13% +3
MCP server (first-party) 8% 12% -4
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 24% 11% +13
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 12% 2% +10
Governance rules 36% 16% +20

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Datadog 77.6
  2. 2 Elastic 77.6
  3. 3 Power BI 65.9
  4. 4 Amazon QuickSight 62.6
  5. 5 Foxglove Technologies 59.4
  6. 6 Amazon Managed Grafana 53.7
  7. 7 Napkin 51
  8. 8 Microsoft Visio API 50.5
  9. 9 Google Data Studio 48.6
  10. 10 Zoho Analytics 36.5
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Datadog 49.6
  2. 2 Foxglove Technologies 37.7
  3. 3 Power BI 35.2
  4. 4 Amazon Managed Grafana 34.1
  5. 5 Kibana 32.5
  6. 6 Zoho Analytics 31.2
  7. 7 Google Data Studio 30.2
  8. 8 Elastic 28.6
  9. 9 Amazon QuickSight 26.2
  10. 10 Napkin 24.8
All 30 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 25 carry a score (83%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 20 of 25 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/visualization"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/visualization"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/visualization/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.