Reporting
Providers using this tag (154)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 25 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 47 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 33 Limited public surface area
Emerging 24 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 15 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (352)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 52 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 56 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 104 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 78 Limited public surface area
Emerging 53 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (275)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Reporting” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 275 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Adtech and Privacy | 20% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 143 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Reporting, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 44.8 | 24.5 | +20.3 | 143 |
| Access Clarity | 48.4 | 30 | +18.4 | 143 |
| Operational Transparency | 31 | 13.2 | +17.8 | 143 |
| Contract Quality | 31.5 | 18.6 | +12.9 | 143 |
| Discoverability | 68.5 | 59.1 | +9.4 | 143 |
| Contract Governance | 16 | 9.7 | +6.3 | 143 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 33% | 18% | +15 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 35% | 16% | +19 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 31% | 13% | +18 |
| Security | 99% | 99% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 1% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 58% | 36% | +22 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Google Analytics 79.7
- 2 Power BI 76
- 3 Sigma Computing 75.9
- 4 Amazon QuickSight 74.4
- 5 Orion Advisor Solutions 71.6
- 6 MOLOCO 71.5
- 7 Google Campaign Manager 70.9
- 8 Awin 69.3
- 9 Constant Contact 67.7
- 10 Cohesity 66.3
- 1 MOLOCO 59
- 2 Fever 58.7
- 3 Sigma Computing 58.3
- 4 TikTok Marketing API 57.9
- 5 Datarails 57.7
- 6 Equals 57
- 7 MarginEdge 56.4
- 8 Standard Metrics 53.6
- 9 Truex Media 53.2
- 10 NextRoll 52.2
Coverage caveat. 102 of 143 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.