AdTech
Advertising TechnologyAdTech
Providers using this tag (180)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 38 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 33 Limited public surface area
Emerging 27 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 59 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 4 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (15)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
180 providers carry this tag directly, and 205 counting the 12 narrower tags below — 25 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 149 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged AdTech, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 36.4 | 23.2 | +13.2 | 149 |
| Operational Transparency | 23 | 13.7 | +9.3 | 149 |
| Access Clarity | 32.8 | 26.5 | +6.3 | 149 |
| Discoverability | 63.9 | 58.1 | +5.8 | 149 |
| Contract Governance | 11.5 | 6.3 | +5.2 | 149 |
| Contract Quality | 21 | 17.6 | +3.4 | 149 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 27% | 14% | +13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 27% | 12% | +15 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 26% | 11% | +15 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Didomi 81
- 2 Outbrain 74.3
- 3 Google Ads 72.9
- 4 Taboola 70.4
- 5 AppsFlyer 67.2
- 6 Scope3 66.7
- 7 MediaMath 66.5
- 8 StackAdapt 65.8
- 9 MOLOCO 63.5
- 10 Criteo 60.7
- 1 Scope3 65.8
- 2 AppLike Group 59.5
- 3 MOLOCO 57
- 4 VidMob 54.1
- 5 Truex Media 53.2
- 6 NextRoll 52.2
- 7 ezoic 51.3
- 8 VideoAmp 50.9
- 9 Permutive 50.2
- 10 MediaMath 48
Coverage caveat. 132 of 149 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.