DSP
Demand-Side PlatformDSP
Providers using this tag (33)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (8)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “DSP” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged DSP, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 49 | 23.2 | +25.8 | 29 |
| Operational Transparency | 33.2 | 13.7 | +19.5 | 29 |
| Access Clarity | 40.4 | 26.5 | +13.9 | 29 |
| Discoverability | 69.8 | 58.1 | +11.7 | 29 |
| Contract Quality | 27.5 | 17.6 | +9.9 | 29 |
| Contract Governance | 15.8 | 6.3 | +9.5 | 29 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 14% | +12 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 23% | 12% | +11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 45% | 11% | +34 |
| Security | 94% | 98% | -4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 19% | 14% | +5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 MediaMath 66.5
- 2 StackAdapt 65.8
- 3 MOLOCO 63.5
- 4 LALAL.AI 62.1
- 5 Google Display & Video 360 57.7
- 6 The Trade Desk 55.1
- 7 Basis 54.2
- 8 InMobi 48.3
- 9 Remerge 46.8
- 10 RTB House 43.8
- 1 MOLOCO 57
- 2 MediaMath 48
- 3 StackAdapt 47.7
- 4 MadHive 44.1
- 5 The Trade Desk 43
- 6 Basis 40.8
- 7 LALAL.AI 37.2
- 8 Google Display & Video 360 31.8
- 9 Choozle 31.5
- 10 iZotope 28.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.