Connected TV
Providers using this tag (27)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (3)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Adtech and Privacy | 32% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 26 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Connected TV, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.3 | 23.2 | +18.1 | 26 |
| Access Clarity | 37.3 | 23.9 | +13.4 | 26 |
| Discoverability | 68 | 57.9 | +10.1 | 26 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.9 | 13 | +9.9 | 26 |
| Contract Governance | 15.6 | 6.5 | +9.1 | 26 |
| Contract Quality | 23.8 | 17.2 | +6.6 | 26 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 31% | 13% | +18 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 23% | 12% | +11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 23% | 11% | +12 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 16% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Outbrain 74.9
- 2 StackAdapt 64.3
- 3 The Trade Desk 55.1
- 4 Magnite 51.3
- 5 MNTN 48.6
- 6 Truex Media 46.9
- 7 GumGum 42.2
- 8 Choozle 41.9
- 9 TripleLift 39.4
- 10 MadHive 39.2
- 1 Truex Media 53.2
- 2 StackAdapt 47.7
- 3 The Trade Desk 44.2
- 4 MadHive 43.7
- 5 Outbrain 34.8
- 6 PubMatic 34.2
- 7 Covatic 33.5
- 8 MNTN 31.8
- 9 Choozle 31.8
- 10 DoubleVerify 29.9
Coverage caveat. 23 of 26 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.