Event
EventEventseventevents
Providers using this tag (188)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 46 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 40 Limited public surface area
Emerging 39 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 36 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (1112)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 142 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 186 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 392 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 291 Limited public surface area
Emerging 95 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (918)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Event” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 918 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 174 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Event, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 38.1 | 26.5 | +11.6 | 174 |
| Contract Quality | 30.7 | 19.8 | +10.9 | 174 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 31 | 23.4 | +7.6 | 174 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.3 | 13.9 | +6.4 | 174 |
| Discoverability | 65.2 | 61.2 | +4 | 174 |
| Contract Governance | 7 | 6.4 | +0.6 | 174 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 10% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 13% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 98% | 96% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Brevo 87.3
- 2 Cvent Registration 82
- 3 Cvent 75.2
- 4 Cvent Event Cloud 69.9
- 5 Givebutter 69.7
- 6 Constant Contact 68.7
- 7 Pirsch 68
- 8 GoToWebinar 64.9
- 9 Antavo 64.1
- 10 GoFundMe 63.7
- 1 Brevo 54.8
- 2 Fever 52.7
- 3 Sequel 52
- 4 Cobot 46.9
- 5 Virtual Incision 46.4
- 6 Cvent Event Cloud 46.1
- 7 Millimetric 45.9
- 8 GoFundMe 43.3
- 9 Cvent 42.6
- 10 Alto (Vebra / Zoopla) 41.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.