Alerting
Alertingalerting
Providers using this tag (37)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (28)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (15)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Alerting” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 35 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Alerting, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 47.9 | 19.8 | +28.1 | 35 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 44.2 | 23.4 | +20.8 | 35 |
| Access Clarity | 45.2 | 26.5 | +18.7 | 35 |
| Operational Transparency | 31.9 | 14 | +17.9 | 35 |
| Discoverability | 69 | 61.2 | +7.8 | 35 |
| Contract Governance | 10.5 | 6.4 | +4.1 | 35 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 33% | 10% | +23 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 33% | 13% | +20 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 17% | 11% | +6 |
| Security | 97% | 97% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 14% | +14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Checkly 71.1
- 2 FireHydrant 65.5
- 3 HyperDX 63.3
- 4 Moogsoft 61.2
- 5 Splunk Observability Cloud 60.8
- 6 LogicMonitor 58.6
- 7 Grafana 57.5
- 8 Scale3 53.9
- 9 Grafana 52.3
- 10 SigNoz 51.7
- 1 Checkly 60
- 2 Chronosphere 56.6
- 3 HookPulse 39.4
- 4 PagerDuty 37.8
- 5 HyperDX 35.9
- 6 Kibana 35.2
- 7 SigNoz 35.1
- 8 Splunk Observability Cloud 34.6
- 9 FireHydrant 34.2
- 10 Spike.sh 34.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.