Device Management
Providers using this tag (62)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (41)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (22)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Device Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 61 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Device Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 39.4 | 23.2 | +16.2 | 61 |
| Contract Quality | 31.5 | 17.6 | +13.9 | 61 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.9 | 13.7 | +13.2 | 61 |
| Access Clarity | 36 | 26.5 | +9.5 | 61 |
| Discoverability | 63.6 | 58.1 | +5.5 | 61 |
| Contract Governance | 9.6 | 6.3 | +3.3 | 61 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 14% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 12% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 11% | -3 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 18% | 14% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ControlUp 75
- 2 Cumulocity 67
- 3 Particle 62.2
- 4 Aeris 62
- 5 Kontakt.io 61.4
- 6 ThingsBoard 60.7
- 7 Iru 59.5
- 8 Amazon IoT Core 58.8
- 9 Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Management 58.8
- 10 Amazon IoT Device Management 58.6
- 1 Kontakt.io 50.5
- 2 Aeris 42.2
- 3 Starlink 38.3
- 4 KORE Wireless 38.2
- 5 ControlUp 35.7
- 6 Iru 33.6
- 7 Blues 32.7
- 8 Cosmoplat 31.5
- 9 ZenAdmin 31
- 10 ThingsBoard 29.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.