Edge Computing
Providers using this tag (100)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 31 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (34)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 18 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (10)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Edge Computing” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 94 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Edge Computing, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.2 | 23.4 | +9.8 | 94 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.3 | 14 | +4.3 | 94 |
| Contract Quality | 22.3 | 19.8 | +2.5 | 94 |
| Access Clarity | 28.7 | 26.5 | +2.2 | 94 |
| Contract Governance | 8.2 | 6.4 | +1.8 | 94 |
| Discoverability | 62.9 | 61.2 | +1.7 | 94 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 10% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 13% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 99% | 97% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 18% | 14% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Netlify 67.3
- 2 Synadia Communications 65.9
- 3 CloudFront 65.7
- 4 Cloudflare 65.1
- 5 Cumulocity 64.4
- 6 Webscale Networks 61.4
- 7 Edgee 58.1
- 8 Spectro Cloud 57.2
- 9 ETSI 56.8
- 10 AT&T 56.4
- 1 Netlify 62.2
- 2 Cloudflare 49.6
- 3 ETSI 46.2
- 4 Akamai 43.1
- 5 AT&T 37.3
- 6 PassiveLogic 37.2
- 7 Amazon IoT Greengrass 36.3
- 8 Scale Computing 35.4
- 9 Synadia Communications 34.2
- 10 Turso 33.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.