Industrial IoT
IIoTIndustrial IoT
Providers using this tag (74)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 24 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 16 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (10)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Industrial IoT” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 71 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Industrial IoT, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 12.3 | 6.3 | +6 | 71 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 29 | 23.2 | +5.8 | 71 |
| Access Clarity | 31.5 | 26.5 | +5 | 71 |
| Contract Quality | 21.4 | 17.6 | +3.8 | 71 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.1 | 13.7 | +1.4 | 71 |
| Discoverability | 59.2 | 58.1 | +1.1 | 71 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 14% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 12% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 26% | 14% | +12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Losant 83.1
- 2 Cumulocity 67
- 3 Hexagon 60.2
- 4 Amazon IoT TwinMaker 56.3
- 5 Amazon IoT SiteWise 55.5
- 6 TTTech 54.1
- 7 Siemens 53.7
- 8 Amazon Lookout for Equipment 50.7
- 9 Amazon Panorama 49.8
- 10 Itron 48.8
- 1 Losant 62.3
- 2 Siemens 38.2
- 3 Amazon IoT SiteWise 34.5
- 4 Cosmoplat 31.5
- 5 Picarro 30.8
- 6 Amazon Panorama 30.6
- 7 Cognite 29.4
- 8 Amazon Monitron 28.8
- 9 TTTech 28.2
- 10 Amazon IoT TwinMaker 28.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.