Industrial IoT
Providers using this tag (66)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 14 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Industrial IoT” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 63 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Industrial IoT, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 12.9 | 6.4 | +6.5 | 63 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 29.6 | 23.4 | +6.2 | 63 |
| Contract Quality | 24.5 | 19.8 | +4.7 | 63 |
| Access Clarity | 31.2 | 26.5 | +4.7 | 63 |
| Operational Transparency | 15.3 | 14 | +1.3 | 63 |
| Discoverability | 61.4 | 61.2 | +0.2 | 63 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 10% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 13% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 27% | 14% | +13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Losant 79.5
- 2 Cumulocity 64.4
- 3 Hexagon 58.3
- 4 Amazon IoT TwinMaker 55.2
- 5 Amazon IoT SiteWise 54.4
- 6 TTTech 52.2
- 7 Itron 52
- 8 Amazon Lookout for Equipment 50.1
- 9 Amazon Panorama 49.2
- 10 Picarro 49.1
- 1 Losant 62.3
- 2 Amazon IoT SiteWise 34.5
- 3 Picarro 32.9
- 4 Cosmoplat 31.5
- 5 Amazon Panorama 30.6
- 6 TTTech 30.3
- 7 Cognite 29.4
- 8 Siemens 28.4
- 9 Amazon IoT TwinMaker 28.1
- 10 Siemens PLM 28.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.