Industrial IoT
Providers using this tag (60)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 13 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 60 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Industrial IoT, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 24.3 | 17.9 | +6.4 | 60 |
| Contract Quality | 23.3 | 17.5 | +5.8 | 60 |
| Contract Governance | 11.6 | 6.4 | +5.2 | 60 |
| Access Clarity | 27.4 | 22.3 | +5.1 | 60 |
| Discoverability | 62.4 | 60.4 | +2 | 60 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.8 | 11.3 | +1.5 | 60 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 16% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 7% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 9% | -1 |
| Security | 95% | 88% | +7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 30% | 13% | +17 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cumulocity 63.2
- 2 Losant 60.6
- 3 Amazon IoT SiteWise 50.8
- 4 Itron 50.4
- 5 Picarro 50.4
- 6 Amazon IoT TwinMaker 49.9
- 7 Amazon Lookout for Equipment 49.4
- 8 Amazon Panorama 49
- 9 Nortech 47.5
- 10 Siemens PLM 44.2
- 1 Amazon IoT SiteWise 34.5
- 2 Andium 33.6
- 3 Picarro 32.9
- 4 Cosmoplat 31.5
- 5 Amazon Panorama 30.6
- 6 Losant 30.6
- 7 Cognite 29.4
- 8 Amazon IoT TwinMaker 28.1
- 9 Siemens MindSphere 28.1
- 10 Siemens PLM 28.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/industrial-iot"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/industrial-iot"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/industrial-iot/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.