Time Series
Providers using this tag (54)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (80)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 34 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (57)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Time Series” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 57 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 52 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Time Series, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 37 | 17.6 | +19.4 | 52 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.1 | 23.2 | +17.9 | 52 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.2 | 13.7 | +11.5 | 52 |
| Access Clarity | 33.6 | 26.5 | +7.1 | 52 |
| Contract Governance | 12.1 | 6.3 | +5.8 | 52 |
| Discoverability | 62.7 | 58.1 | +4.6 | 52 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 25% | 14% | +11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 21% | 12% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 38% | 14% | +24 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Losant 83.1
- 2 Aedifion 62.5
- 3 Adafruit IO 60.4
- 4 ThingSpeak 59.2
- 5 Sift Stack 56.9
- 6 7SIGNAL 56.7
- 7 Amazon Forecast 56.2
- 8 Timescale 54.9
- 9 Fixer 53.5
- 10 Nixtla 48.9
- 1 Losant 62.3
- 2 7SIGNAL 51.3
- 3 Aedifion 47.8
- 4 Sift Stack 37.2
- 5 Meteomatics 35.8
- 6 Verdigris Technologies 34.4
- 7 Elemental Machines 33.6
- 8 Nixtla 32.4
- 9 InfluxDB 32.3
- 10 Amazon Forecast 30.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.