Time Series
Time SeriesTime-SeriesTimeSeriesTimeseriestimeseries
Providers using this tag (56)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (83)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 26 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (61)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Time Series” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 61 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 53 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Time Series, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 40.9 | 19.8 | +21.1 | 53 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.4 | 23.4 | +20 | 53 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.3 | 14 | +13.3 | 53 |
| Access Clarity | 35.1 | 26.5 | +8.6 | 53 |
| Discoverability | 69.1 | 61.2 | +7.9 | 53 |
| Contract Governance | 12.8 | 6.4 | +6.4 | 53 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 10% | +10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 22% | 13% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 20% | 11% | +9 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 36% | 14% | +22 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Losant 79.5
- 2 Aedifion 65.8
- 3 Adafruit IO 61.3
- 4 Sift Stack 60.6
- 5 ThingSpeak 60.6
- 6 Corva AI 59
- 7 Amazon Forecast 55.7
- 8 Fixer 54.8
- 9 7SIGNAL 54.1
- 10 Timescale 53.3
- 1 Losant 62.3
- 2 Aedifion 50.2
- 3 7SIGNAL 40.1
- 4 Sift Stack 39.7
- 5 Verdigris Technologies 36.9
- 6 Meteomatics 35.8
- 7 Corva AI 33.2
- 8 Nixtla 32.4
- 9 InfluxDB 32.3
- 10 Timescale 31.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.